We performed a comparison between OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools."Provides the performance of load test applications and reliably on good reporting."
"It is also good for reporting purposes, which would be most familiar for QC and UFT users."
"Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is easy to use and has flexibility that allows it to be used on a variety of applications."
"It's a very powerful tool."
"Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Is very user-friendly."
"With Performance Center, the version upgrade is easy. You just have to roll out the new patch or the new version."
"IP Spoofing can be done using Performance Center."
"One of the most valuable features of this solution is recording and replaying, and the fact that there are multiple options available to do this."
"The most valuable feature has been to store all our packages in one place including SSIS packages, SQL tables, TFS and SSR."
"The user interface is very friendly."
"User-friendly ID and direct integration with GitHub are the most valuable."
"The product is good to create big or small projects fastly. It is one of the leaders in the area."
"We are satisfied with technical support. Communicating with them is very simple. We also have a lot of online resources to check and to study and to train our team with. The documentation is very clear and readily available."
"The ability to quickly make your own components has been valuable."
"The solution is very stable."
"It is a good and user-friendly tool."
"Dashboard creation should be implemented, so we can get the results in a desired format."
"Currently, when we try open LRE we encounter cookie banner issues. However, I'm not sure if it is within the enterprise solution or with the vendors."
"More real-time monitoring should be available for the system under test."
"They had wanted to change the GUI to improve the look and feel. However, since that time, we see a lot of hanging issues."
"I have seen some users report some issues, but I have personally not had any issues."
"The installation has not been straightforward, and we have had so many problems. We have had to re-install, try to install on a different machine, etc. We have not been able to launch the LRE server itself yet."
"The product's scalability must be improved."
"The reporting has room for improvement."
"In Visual Studio we still don't have anything which can pinpoint memory leaks on a certain code line."
"The database administration could be better; you should be able to choose new tools with the development environment in Visual Studio. It could be easier to use."
"The tool crashes and has high memory consumption."
"I would appreciate some enhancements in the interface, maybe adding more color options."
"The performance could be faster."
"Visual Studio Test Professional needs to improve its scalability."
"Its UI could be better."
"The solution should be cheaper."
More OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is ranked 5th in Performance Testing Tools with 81 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 48 reviews. OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is rated 8.4, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise writes "Saves time and effort, and makes it easy to set up scenarios and execute tests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is most compared with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText Silk Performer, Tricentis NeoLoad and OpenText UFT One, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText UFT One.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.