We performed a comparison between OpenText ProVision and Visio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information."
"All the features come as part of a standard license."
"The stability of the product is very good."
"Visio is stable."
"It is pretty easy to use if you are looking for this type of solution."
"Architecture modeling software with satisfactory standard features. It's also stable and effective in facilitating communication with others."
"The solution is easy to understand with some hands-on experience."
"The interface is the most valuable aspect of this solution."
"I like the way you can hypertext across tabs so you can actually create an interactive that you can export as a website. You can also extend it to a monitoring tool if you really wanted to."
"Putting details into the process flow and being able to link other objects into the diagrams are very helpful features."
"The product is stable."
"Lacks the ability to have your own in-house developments."
"OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use."
"Integrating with or interfacing with other tools like data management tools would be very helpful."
"Visio could be improved by adding more features. If you look at draw.io, they have more features. Also, if you want to design something for the cloud, Microsoft Azure still isn't enabled, so you need to install the plugin. This prototype is easily available, though."
"I would like to see traceability. It doesn't have it. You cannot find one object amongst several sheets of Visio diagrams."
"I would like to be able to present diagrams in multiple ways, such as a Swimlane diagram."
"Something that needs to improve, is the interface interaction with other tools."
"Extremely large complex drawings need to be saved on the cloud for access."
"Its support team could be well-equipped with the required information."
"Visio could improve by simplifying the application to allow the business user more understanding. This will allow us to bring the solution deeper into the organization for use. It can be difficult to navigate and some users tend to rely on third-party applications for auditing, compliance, and policy configuration."
"In terms of features, it could provide more automation to display data flowing through architecture."
OpenText ProVision is ranked 35th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews while Visio is ranked 1st in Business Process Design with 100 reviews. OpenText ProVision is rated 6.4, while Visio is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of OpenText ProVision writes "Good attribute attachment but problems with collaboration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visio writes "A software for drawing a variety of diagrams which include flowcharts, org charts, building plans, floor plans, data flow diagrams". OpenText ProVision is most compared with ARIS BPA, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and SAP Signavio Process Manager, whereas Visio is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Bizagi, Visual Paradigm, IBM Blueworks Live and Lucidchart.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.