We performed a comparison between SUSE NeuVector and Trend Micro Cloud One based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: SUSE NeuVector is distinguished by its ISO certification verification and advanced automation. Trend Micro Cloud One offers comprehensive protection against vulnerabilities, login inspection, event tracking, and a bug bounty program. SUSE NeuVector could improve by adding support for scanning IaaS and virtual machines and enhancing its monitoring and reporting capabilities. Users also want better integration with other security solutions and greater visibility into the DevSec pipeline. Trend Micro Cloud One should focus equally focus on AWS and Azure while improving automation and robustness.
Service and Support: Customers are pleased with the technical assistance offered by SUSE NeuVector, finding it helpful, responsive, and knowledgeable. However, there are concerns about the complexity of the support process. Trend Micro Cloud One was highly praised for its customer service and support. Users valued the support team's expertise and liked the round-the-clock availability.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for SUSE NeuVector can be challenging, depending on the environment and complexity of the project. It may require custom scripts for integration into the pipeline, and more skilled personnel are needed as the complexity increases. Deploying Trend Micro Cloud One can take upwards of a month and requires some development experience. Those with experience consider the deployment to be straightforward, but it typically involves a team of engineers or a small group of people managing the solution.
Pricing: SUSE NeuVector users gave mixed feedback on the pricing, but some users mentioned that large customers can negotiate a better deal. Trend Micro Cloud One's pricing is considered a little high, but users said it falls within the middle range. There may be additional costs depending on the specific use case. The licensing contracts are annual, but there are options for monthly, quarterly, or yearly payments.
ROI: SUSE NeuVector is highly beneficial for industries such as financial services, offering a valuable return on investment. Trend Micro Cloud One stands out for its flexibility and ease of integration.
Comparison Results: Trend Micro Cloud One is the preferred choice over SUSE NeuVector. Users appreciate its comprehensive security features, scalability, and ease of setup. The pricing is considered reasonable, and the payment options are flexible. Trend Micro technical support is highly rated for its knowledge and expertise.
"The management console is highly intuitive to comprehend and operate."
"PingSafe's most valuable feature is its unified console."
"The ease of use of the platform is very nice."
"The solution's most valuable features are its ability to detect vulnerabilities inside AWS resources and its ability to rescan after a specific duration set by the administrator."
"It saves time, makes your environment more secure, and improves compliance. PingSafe helps with audits, ensuring that you are following best practices for cloud security. You don't need to be an expert to use it and improve your security."
"Cloud Native Security is user-friendly. Everything in the Cloud Native Security tool is straightforward, including detections, integration, reporting, etc. They are constantly improving their UI by adding plugins and other features."
"PingSafe's integration is smooth. They are highly customer-oriented, and the integration went well for us."
"The visibility is the best part of the solution."
"When it comes to the price, we got a really good deal from the vendor instantly."
"The initial setup is quite good, it's straightforward."
"The tool's deployment is simple. Also, I am impressed with its risk capabilities."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security."
"The features of image scanning and anti-malware are really valuable."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is the performance, deployment, and cost."
"The UI has a lot of features."
"Detection response and cloud conformity are valuable features."
"The storage and computing features are valuable."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's best features are security analysis, remote access security, and driver security."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security does not utilize a lot of resources which allows our users to keep working even during a scan."
"Virtual patching is one of the key features, which is executed with their IPS."
"The stability is quite good."
"The perfect package for all security platforms, providing more than any other endpoint solution."
"It has the best EDR functionality for cloud and typical endpoints."
"I would like PingSafe to add real-time detection of vulnerabilities and cloud misconfigurations."
"It does not bring much threat intel from the outside world. All it does is scan. If it can also correlate things, it will be better."
"One of our use cases was setting up a firewall for our endpoints, specifically for our remote users... We were hoping to utilize SentinelOne's firewall capabilities, but there were limitations on how many URLs we could implement. Because of those limitations on the number of URLs, we weren't able to utilize that feature in the way we had hoped to."
"The integration with Oracle has room for improvement."
"Scanning capabilities should be added for the dark web."
"We recently adopted a new ticket management solution, so we've asked them to include a connector to integrate that tool with Cloud Native Security directly. We'd also like to see Cloud Native Security add a scan for personally identifying information. We're looking at other tools for this capability, but having that functionality built into Cloud Native Security would be nice. Monitoring PII data is critical to us as an organization."
"There's an array of upcoming versions with numerous features to be incorporated into the roadmap. Customers particularly appreciate the service's emphasis on intensive security, especially the secret scanning aspect. During the proof of concept (POC) phase, the system is required to gather logs from the customer's environment. This process entails obtaining specific permissions, especially in terms of gateway access. While most permissions for POC are manageable, the need for various permissions may need improvement, especially in the context of security."
"There is no break-glass account feature. They should implement this as soon as possible because we can't implement SSO without a break-glass feature."
"The tool should offer seamless integration of other security tools while in a hybrid environment."
"SUSE NeuVector could improve by increasing its visibility into other elements of the DevSecOps pipeline. Additionally, scanning around infrastructure would be helpful."
"The documentation needs to improve a bit."
"I would say that this solution should improve monitoring and reporting. I would also like to see more integrations so that we could essentially make it a part of a developing pipeline."
"We are also working with IaaS VMS, but NeuVector doesn't support virtual machines."
"SUSE NeuVector should provide more security protection rules and better container image scanning."
"The image-scanning features need improvement."
"There are also some loopholes because it's a new product that they have recently migrated to the cloud. We do see some issues with the policies we have assigned when it comes to a particular account. There are some issues with system support, such as a particular server kernel version that is not supported."
"The licensing model could be improved. To gain full coverage, you need to spend more to buy subscriptions for each kind of service they offer. It will start to be pricey if you want full coverage."
"The firewall configuration should have been automated based on the understanding of the application, utilities, and protocols."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security should address threats automatically without having user input."
"The dashboard should be a bit more intuitive."
"The local agent should be able to show more logs. At present, the logs are only available from the web console and not from the local agent."
"The pricing can get high."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security seems to have a preference for AWS Cloud over Azure and would be improved by focusing equally on both."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
SUSE NeuVector is ranked 19th in Container Security with 7 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 8th in Container Security with 17 reviews. SUSE NeuVector is rated 7.8, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of SUSE NeuVector writes "Good value for money; great for policy management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". SUSE NeuVector is most compared with Sysdig Falco, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes and Sysdig Secure, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration and Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks. See our SUSE NeuVector vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors and best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
