We performed a comparison between TeamViewer and TeamViewer Pilot based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Remote Access solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."TeamViewer is fast and easy to manipulate."
"The most valuable feature of TeamViewer is user-friendliness."
"It is a scalable product."
"TeamViewer has been one of the easiest, right off the bat products, that we have employed at the college. We have had no issues. It's been one of the easiest solutions to pick up."
"The most valuable feature has been the ability to give control to others for support purposes."
"It saves trips to customer sites, which saves time. I am able to get in there remotely and fix things."
"The quality of the call and the quality of the sharing have been excellent."
"The TeamViewer system has some built-in security. The TeamViewer client connects to the TeamViewer host securely. Only a certain number of authorized users on our side have access to the system. Even within that, an individual endpoint can be assigned to a group, where not everybody has access but, rather, just one or two people who are part of a support team might have access to that particular device. So TeamViewer has given us tools to be able to segregate who has access to different things."
"TeamViewer could improve by adding support for other operating systems, such as Linux and CAKE."
"The security could improve in TeamViewer."
"The file transfer functionality crashes sometimes."
"The business interface is clunky and not well-documented."
"They should release features such as Augmented Reality into both plain and standard versions of TeamViewer."
"Sometimes it lags."
"I would like it if the trial version of TeamViewer allowed you to have a connection for much longer."
"You can't configure multiple, unattended control passwords on the Mac. On the Mac, there's only one. On Windows, there are multiple unattended control passwords. I have people in different departments. My infrastructure people need to control a server and my developers may need to go into that same server. But I don't want them to have the same password... on the Mac, it can be done but it's extremely clunky and problematic."
"The location markings can appear incorrectly."
"It's quite power-hungry and some customers complain that it drains the batteries on their smartphones very quickly."
Earn 20 points
TeamViewer is ranked 1st in Remote Access with 85 reviews while TeamViewer Pilot is ranked 29th in Remote Access. TeamViewer is rated 8.6, while TeamViewer Pilot is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of TeamViewer writes "Solid cross-platform remote control, but with kludgy central management and some serious feature issues on macOS". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamViewer Pilot writes "Good tech support ". TeamViewer is most compared with TeamViewer Tensor, Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, Parallels Access, ISL Online and BeyondTrust Remote Support, whereas TeamViewer Pilot is most compared with TeamViewer Tensor. See our TeamViewer vs. TeamViewer Pilot report.
See our list of best Remote Access vendors.
We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.