We performed a comparison between enable.sc and Trend Micro Cloud One based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Tenable.sc has a user-friendly interface and fewer false positives, while Trend Micro Cloud One has good workload management and technical control. Tenable.sc excels in accurate detection, prioritization, and automation, while Trend Micro Cloud One provides excellent virtual patching, login inspection, and container security. Tenable.sc needs to improve its penetration testing, pricing, GUI, reporting, vendor training, and accuracy of vulnerability assessments. On the other hand, Trend Micro Cloud One needs to enhance its pricing, automation, robustness, licensing, marketing documentation, local agent logs, alerts, and flexibility.
Service and Support: Tenable.sc's customer service has received mixed feedback, with users reporting delays and unhelpful information. Meanwhile, Trend Micro Cloud One has received largely positive reviews for their customer service, with customers praising the responsiveness and knowledge of the support team.
Ease of Deployment: Tenable.sc has a simple and uncomplicated initial setup process, which can be completed quickly in just one day. In contrast, Trend Micro Cloud One's setup is more complex and can take anywhere from several hours to a month, depending on the technical expertise and environmental complexity involved. Furthermore, Cloud One necessitates daily monitoring for vulnerabilities and problems.
Pricing: Tenable.sc charges based on the number of IP addresses and has additional costs for advanced support, while some find it reasonable and others consider it expensive. Trend Micro Cloud One's pricing is in the middle range and they offer additional services for a better infrastructure picture. The price has decreased by 25% in recent years.
ROI: Tenable.sc offers cost savings by reducing the need for additional manpower, ensuring a positive return on investment. On the other hand, Trend Micro Cloud One is known for its versatility and seamless integration capabilities.
Comparison Results: Tenable.sc is the preferred option over Trend Micro Cloud One for vulnerability scanning and reporting, according to user reviews. Tenable.sc offers more sophisticated scanning capabilities, timely updates, and fewer false positives than its competitors. While Trend Micro Cloud One is praised for its virtual patching and login inspection features, users have reported high pricing, complex initial setup, and inadequate marketing documentation.
"What is useful to me is being able to fulfill very customized scanning policies. In the clinical environment, because of vendor control, we can't perform credential-vulnerability scanning. And network scans, which I've done before, can cause a lot of impact. Being able to create very customized policies to be able to routinely scan and audit our clinical networks, while simultaneously not causing impact, is important to us."
"The most valuable features of Tenable SC are scanning, reporting, dashboards, and automation."
"Compared to other products, the most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and ability to provide visibility over scan results while providing many templates to users, making it a helpful tool."
"The most valuable feature of the product is the Assurance Report Card, which gives us an overview of the security poster in just a simple glance."
"The predictive prioritization features are pretty good. They do a lot of research and we trust the research that they do internally. They have knowledge of what's going on with many companies, where we only get a view into what's going on here. So the ability to get best practices out of them as part of this solution, is valuable to us."
"The product is our second solution, and we are happy that it meets our requirements."
"I found the dashboard features very useful. It made it easy to track remediation progress. I could publish dashboards to remediation teams and track the progress on the dashboards."
"The solution has a lean and easy-to-use interface that is not confusing to first-time users."
"The security is good."
"The most valuable part of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is its dashboard, as it's simple. It's easy to manage, and you can better control the solution."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security does not utilize a lot of resources which allows our users to keep working even during a scan."
"The product helps us understand our environment better."
"Vision One is versatile and can be integrated with many SIEMs. You're not limited to only one SIEM, such as Microsoft Sentinel. The API integrations are seamless, and we have all the documentation needed to integrate Vision One via API."
"The the most valuable feature is the scanning engine. It does not impact server performance. It's very lightweight."
"The perfect package for all security platforms, providing more than any other endpoint solution."
"The stability is quite good."
"Tenable SC can improve by making it easier to create complicated reports and have more effectiveness in the remediation area for comparison between the scans."
"Tenable has some problems with agents going offline during scanning and lag between agents and the security center."
"I will say it's a lot slower compared to an MS scan. It takes so much longer, so the performance could definitely be worked on."
"The solution should include compliance-based scanning."
"I think the vendor training provided for Tenable.sc could be a lower price. It's quite expensive for the training."
"The solution needs to improve the vulnerability assessment because we have experienced some challenges with accuracy."
"The product could be user-friendly, and they could enhance the web application's security features."
"The tool's initial configuration is not so easy."
"They should provide a way for users to see violations for specific compliance."
"The initial setup can be complex for the inexperienced."
"The dashboard should be a bit more intuitive."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security seems to have a preference for AWS Cloud over Azure and would be improved by focusing equally on both."
"The licensing model could be improved. To gain full coverage, you need to spend more to buy subscriptions for each kind of service they offer. It will start to be pricey if you want full coverage."
"Securing S3 using Trend Vision One - Cloud Security can cost too much. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has a tool that requires lots of privileges. From my understanding, it's only for static application testing, so they need to add dynamic application testing, and there should be more collaboration with the application testing tools on the market. We have not used this product, and I don't know if they plan to decommission it or something. They should focus on application security because this tool's unique feature is multi-cloud support. However, they should improve integration with tools for these kinds of use cases, especially application security and dynamic scanning. For example, I would like it to support Dell SecureOps. I'd also like to see some enhancements to API gateway security."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security could improve connections with different types of authentication and user groups concerning cloud services."
"The local agent should be able to show more logs. At present, the logs are only available from the web console and not from the local agent."
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Tenable Security Center is ranked 10th in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) with 48 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 5th in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) with 17 reviews. Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Nessus and Horizon3.ai, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP. See our Tenable Security Center vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
