We performed a comparison between ABBYY Vantage and ElectroNeek based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features have been the rate of recognition and the structured documents."
"The solution's technical support is very supportive."
"While using ABBYY FlexiCapture we did not use the generic models that they do have for invoice and purchase orders. For one of the use-cases, the document was exactly the purchase order, but we are not using that generic model. We are creating the model from Scratch. However, if I was to compare ABBYY FlexiCapture with other IA tools, the machine learning and how the extraction is done is far better than competitors. This allows a lot less effort for the development."
"There are a lot of options in ABBYY FlexiCapture, and it is very vast. I have worked with multiple OCR tools, and I found ABBYY FlexiCapture to be the most accurate tool."
"It saves us a lot of manual work."
"Its ease of use is valuable. It is easy to use and configure."
"ABBYY Vantage has reduced our data because it can classify and extract information from documents."
"The UI is user-friendly and ABBYY Vantage supports over 100 languages."
"We find the OCR feature very valuable, due to the corrector recognition that it provides; this is very useful for document processing."
"My favorite feature is that you can have unlimited bots without having to buy more licenses. That's a powerful option for scalability."
"The solution is user-friendly with a really good UI and ID."
"ElectroNeek was extremely easy to use, especially its UI was easy to navigate with limited training."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"The cost is the best thing about ElectroNeek."
"The product's setup is straightforward."
"The most valuable feature is the price."
"I would like to see a machine learning model to make the solution more intelligent."
"The product must provide more supporting documentation on the API capabilities of Advanced Designer."
"They should improve the RESTful API side of this solution. Currently, fully RESTful API is not available in the on-prem version, which is really a problem, and we have to work around this limitation. The cloud version already has a fully RESTful API, but the on-prem version doesn't have a fully RESTful API, which is a big mistake. It is easy to solve, but they aren't solving it quicker. They are taking a long time. Nowadays, most people don't go to the interface. They like to use RESTful API."
"There is an area of improvement. For example, when we read the data from the OCR, the accuracy is not good."
"The recognition intelligence could improve by having more details in the documents. There are limitations with the forms, templates, and manuscripts."
"ABBYY FlexiCapture could improve in the maintenance, and there are some issues. You have to make efforts to do corrections. Additionally, it could be more user-friendly in terms of connecting between different solutions."
"This solution could be improved by offering better integration with other platforms."
"The modelling, classification and handwritten information are not great."
"Its price could definitely be lower."
"The solution works well with Google Chrome, but not with Microsoft Edge, which is the browser we use for automation."
"ElectroNeek comes with three activities and we cannot add activities like we can with uiPADs."
"It's not applicable to very large enterprises and for difficult work or more complex processes."
"I think that this solution could improve remote desktop interactions."
"The solution needs to improve its stability."
"The integrating capability of the product needs to be improved, to ensure that it works with all systems involved in a process."
"When I wanted to use web scraping for tables in web applications, I found through online forums that such functionality or activity is currently not working as it shows."
ABBYY Vantage is ranked 6th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 46 reviews while ElectroNeek is ranked 20th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 9 reviews. ABBYY Vantage is rated 8.0, while ElectroNeek is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of ABBYY Vantage writes "Genius-level AI with very easy setup and implementation processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ElectroNeek writes "User-friendly, good UI, but does not work well with Microsoft Edge". ABBYY Vantage is most compared with UiPath Document Understanding, UiPath, HyperScience, Microsoft Power Automate and Tungsten TotalAgility, whereas ElectroNeek is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Automation Anywhere (AA) and Robocorp. See our ABBYY Vantage vs. ElectroNeek report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors, best Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) vendors, and best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
