We performed a comparison between Airlock and AWS WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."Our customers are more than satisfied with the user experience provided by the product."
"AWS WAF is a stable solution. The performance of the solution is very good."
"The most valuable feature is the capability to limit access based on geographical location by restricting specific IP addresses."
"AWS WAF is very easy to use and configure on AWS."
"The most valuable feature is the addition of managed tools that help us create customizable rules. In case we want to block a particular request, we can make use of those rules."
"AWS WAF has a lot of integrated features and services. For example, there are security services that can be integrated very well for our customers."
"This is not a product that you need to install. You just use it."
"The security firewall plus the features that protect against database injections or scripting,"
"What I like best about AWS WAF is that it's a simple tool, so I could understand the basics of AWS WAF in two to three hours."
"The tool must be simplified."
"The solution is cloud-based, and therefore the billing model that comes with it could be more intuitive, in my opinion. It's very easy to not fully understand how you tag things for billing and then you can quite easily run up a high bill without realizing it. The solution needs to be more intuitive around the tagging system, which enables the billing. Right now, I have a cloud architect that does that on our behalf and it isn't something that a business user could use because it still requires quite a lot of technical knowledge to do effectively."
"They have to do more to improve, to innovate more features. They need to increase the security. It has to be more active in detecting threats."
"We should be able to do proper whitelisting."
"The solution's pricing could be improved."
"This solution could be improved if the configuration steps were more specific to WAF, compared to other cloud services."
"The serverless product from AWS WAF could be improved. For example, they have only one serverless series, Lambda, but they should extend and improve it. Additionally, the firewall rules are not very easy to configure."
"It's a bit difficult to apply the right rules for the right security."
"The product should improve the DDoS-related features."
Airlock is ranked 22nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review while AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 52 reviews. Airlock is rated 10.0, while AWS WAF is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Airlock writes "Provides endless features and can be adapted to every single application that exists in the world". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". Airlock is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, HUMAN BotGuard for Applications and Citrix Web App and API Protection, whereas AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.