We performed a comparison between ARIS BPA and Bizagi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Design solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The matrix model makes building relations easier."
"The initial setup is easy."
"It helps the business make an informed decision."
"If you ever tried to draw a picture in a browser app or with a cloud service, it is normally a painful death. ARIS works perfectly on diagrams in the browser, so I was excited. I like it because there have been so many bad experiences in the past with drawing or doing something in a browser. Normally, it's always painful because it's coded badly. With ARIS, it is really well-implemented. It's simple."
"The most valuable feature in the latest versions is the connect portal, where you can do very simple modeling using the web-based portal."
"ARIS process modeling and analysis allows integration of end-to-end business processes with the organization's vision, strategies, and business objectives, through visual management."
"It is a well-featured, functional product."
"In general, the users really like it and they can get started using it very easily."
"Great mapping feature that's easy to use."
"The user interface is pretty good."
"Bizagi is flexible. I can share things with other consultants because it is the most commonly used software in my community. It has been a great and good resource for us in making sure that we adhere to the process."
"The interface, design, and accessible user manuals to help get started using the solution are valuable features in Bizagi."
"The amount of control that this solution provides is great."
"Business process modelling and simulation."
"I like all of the features. I like that you can simulate the processes and add the time standard."
"What I find most valuable is the flexibility, I find it very easy to use and very flexible for my purpose. I can use it without any particular problem, and it's very intuitive and easy to understand."
"Its governance tool and integration with ESB and execution engine can be improved. Their partner support can also be improved."
"I would like the possibility to use real data. In other words, it can use this system to integrate with others that are operating directing with users like clients, employs, and others."
"Create simple data uploader."
"In terms of improvement, the app could use some small details and functionalities."
"The standard out-of-the-box solutions for modeling are not so good. You have to do some configuration to make it easier and more user-friendly."
"There is a lot of room for improvement. They need to increase the performance of the system flow. They need to support it more. ARIS Process Governance is still quite basic, and they are using an old BPM and process automation module."
"The areas of ARIS where we see room for improvement are actually related to the background services that support it. Over the last number of years, Software AG has moved from an on-premises solution into deploying a SaaS solution to their enterprise base. That has been really successful from my point of view, as I have been a customer of ARIS, managing the relationship, for a couple years. Certain support functions around the knowledge base, customer service, and the cross and upselling of modules within the core ARIS component are lagging behind the SaaS movement."
"The tool needs to improve its support since they take long to respond."
"Can be difficult for new users."
"The solution is a bit heavy on resources and has slowed down my computer."
"One of the features which could be improved is machine learning. Even though this product has been working on this topic, we can see that it still requires improvement."
"One part of the university has changed its regular desktops to Linux. This is a weak point because Bizagi doesn't run on Linux. I would like the opportunity to run the software inside of Linux."
"Cloud support for their process mapping tool could be better. To map all your processes in any way and call your data, you need to download their on-premise setup or their desktop setup. Cloud support for process mapping is limited, and they should work on that."
"The open source version lacks the option to publish."
"They should improve the migration process between major versions, from version 9 to 10, we had to redo our implementation."
"I would like to see the automation process included in the next release."
ARIS BPA is ranked 3rd in Business Process Design with 64 reviews while Bizagi is ranked 5th in Business Process Design with 78 reviews. ARIS BPA is rated 8.4, while Bizagi is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of ARIS BPA writes "I can usually find an answer to my issue on ARIS Community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bizagi writes "A flexible, customizable solution that reduced time to market, but the UI and customer support could be better". ARIS BPA is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, ADONIS, Camunda, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Visio, whereas Bizagi is most compared with Camunda, Visio, Bonita, Microsoft Power Apps and Appian. See our ARIS BPA vs. Bizagi report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors and best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Esperaba algo mas de este estilo, sin embargo desarrollé esta tabla de comparación de Suites BPM, la cuál no puedo anexar por lo que dejo en formato de texto en caso deque alguien requiera este conocimiento.
Esta tabla fue desarrollada basandome en textos acádemicos de fuentes confiables. Sin embargo no pude encontrar el numero aproximado de clientes que usan ARIS, por lo que si alguien cuenta con esta información se lo agradecería mucho, ya que es el último dato que requiero para completar esta tabla comparativa.
BizAgi Suite, Bonita BPM, IBM Suite, ARIS + Webmethods, AuraPortal, Oracle Suite, Appian eBPM HOPEX
Requiere pago Software licenciado (anual o perpetuo), freeware en versiones académicas Versión pagada (licenciamiento anual) y versión gratuita Software licenciado Software licenciado Software licenciado Versión pagada y versión gratuita Software licenciado Versión pagada y versión gratuita
Código abierto No Si (GPL) No No No No No No
Diseño intuitivo Bastante Intuitivo Bastante Intuitivo Medianamente intuitivo Bastante Intuitivo Bastante Intuitivo Requiere tiempo de adaptación Medianamente intuitivo Bastante Intuitivo
Acceso a licencia de prueba. Si No No Si Si No Si Si
Tutoriales y Soporte técnico Si Si Si Si Si Si Si Si
Notación para diagramar BPMN 2.0 BPMN 2.0 BPMN 2.0, BPEL BPMN 2.0, EPC BPMN 2.0 BPMN 2.0, BPEL BPMN 2.0, EPC BPMN 2.0
Compatibilidad con base de datos SQL Server, Oracle, MySQL SQL Server, PostgreSQL, MySQL, Oracle, HSQL SQL Server SQL Server, Oracle SQL Server Oracle SQL Server, Oracle, MySQL SQL Server, Oracle
Sistema operativo Windows, Linux Multi-plataforma Multi-plataforma Windows, Linux, Mac Windows Multi-plataforma Windows, Linux, Solaris Windows
Monitoreo en tiempo real Si Si Si No Si Si Si Regular
Servicio en la nube Si Si Si Si Si Si Si Si
Requiere programación No No Poco Poco No Si Poco No
Número de clientes >500 >1000 >3500 >800 >2000 >2000 >2700
Principales clientes Adidas Group, BBVA, Telefónica, BNP Paribas Xerox, Stanford University, CSC Barclays, Emericon, Banca popolare di Milano, Saperion Fujitsu, Coca Cola, Electrolux, ING, Credit Suisse Toyota, RSA Chile, Coprusa Group, Refinery of the Pacific REDISA, Panduit, Total E&P Indonesie Amazon, M&T Bank, Nissan, Ford, Baxter Credit Union GNP, P&G, EuroControl, British American Tobacco
Permite importar/exportar archivos BPMN Si Si Si Si Si Solo importación Si Si
Nivel de documentación Medio Alto Medio Alto Alto Medio Bajo Alto
Considera reglas de Negocio Si Si No Si Si No Si Si
Validación de Modelo (diagramas) Si Si Si Si No Si Si
Permite simulación Si Si Si Si Si Si Si No
Requiere conocimiento del producto Poco Poco Normal Poco Poco Normal Normal Poco
Año primera versión lanzada 1989 2001 1998 2009 2001 1997 1999 1994
Accesibilidad móvil Si Si Si Si Si Si Si No
Nivel de seguridad Regular Regular Regular Alto Alto Alto
Facilidad de instalación Sencilla Sencilla Sencilla Sencilla Sencilla Media Sencilla Media
Versión en español SI Si Si No Si Si No Si
Saludos.