We performed a comparison between Bizagi vs.Camunda Platform based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Both solutions received very positive reviews from users. Bizagi has the winning edge in this comparison because of users’ reports of easier deployment and better support.
"Business process modelling and simulation."
"The user logic is very easy to understand, even for people who are not engineers nor developers."
"Bizagi is really great for beginners because it's user-friendly and you can learn in it quickly, whereas other similar software are harder."
"The most valuable feature is the simulation."
"I find Bizagi so user friendly. I also think that its modeling abilities are great and it's easy to teach them to new users."
"The solution offers a free version of their product."
"The most valuable feature is the organizational modeling capability."
"I like the ease of use and the fact that you can download and use their free version, which is unlimited. However, while it's unlimited use, some features aren't available."
"Camunda Platform has a very good interface for workflow and business process design."
"The product has a good task management engine."
"We have a lot of users, almost 1,800, and we needed something affordable, stable and something that could be used by a large financial company. This solution truly fit the bill."
"We are using the BPMN engine of Camunda; we are not using the user interface. We are using just the engine, the back end of this. For us, it is working quite well."
"For an internal project, this is a solution that you can install and have up and running quite quickly."
"It has an open BPM"
"The UI is very user-friendly compared to other products. The native, vanilla UI is very interesting and intuitive to use. It's user-friendly when it comes to modernizing a business process."
"The most valuable features are that it's lightweight, can be embedded in existing Java code, and keeps track of the workflow state and the instances that we need."
"Can be difficult for new users."
"For the small business, this is very bad because it is still fragmented. The licensing policy should be more flexible and small company oriented. In micro-small companies, there should only be one or two. That's not the problem. Maybe it is too flexible, there are so many pieces that you need to put together. When you have a small business, it can be a little complicated, not so easy."
"There could be more documentation."
"Bizagi could be improved by more automation and machine learning. Now that I'm learning more about data analyzers, I'm realizing that many people have problems with data and how to understand them."
"Cloud support for their process mapping tool could be better. To map all your processes in any way and call your data, you need to download their on-premise setup or their desktop setup. Cloud support for process mapping is limited, and they should work on that."
"In terms of what needs improvement, the costs can be lowered."
"I think that they could improve their update process. Some of the process mining techniques could be added to Bizagi. I think that they can improve their simulation abilities to include more elements of the BPMN."
"Bizagi has been aggressively adding features to maintain its market-leading position, however, in some cases, this has impacted the stability of certain product builds."
"The solution's pricing and scalability could be improved."
"The documentation could use improvement."
"While it's very scalable, it would be great if auto-scaling capabilities were added to it... one area that really could help out would be to have dynamic resizing of the cluster. Right now, you have to do capacity planning."
"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options."
"The initial set up could be simplified, it's complex."
"The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages."
"I'm from the .NET world and I would like to use it, rather than Java."
"Customization and tech stack could be up-to-date."
Bizagi is ranked 5th in Business Process Design with 78 reviews while Camunda is ranked 2nd in Business Process Design with 71 reviews. Bizagi is rated 8.4, while Camunda is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Bizagi writes "A flexible, customizable solution that reduced time to market, but the UI and customer support could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". Bizagi is most compared with Visio, Bonita, ARIS BPA, Microsoft Power Apps and Appian, whereas Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Pega BPM, IBM BPM, Appian and Bonita. See our Bizagi vs. Camunda report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors, best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors, and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
I have been using Camunda and BizAgi, amongst some others, during an evaluation.
Both are easy to use. My business peers tended towards Camunda because we would get a native language speaking support (in German). (However, for very other reasons we did choose something very different).
Hi, i have not use Camunda platform yet