We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and Zendesk based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Knowledge Management Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We value the way we can tag documentation to Jira because we can cross-reference a Jira ticket to a Confluence page, and we can also add a Confluence page to a Jira ticket."
"The solution offers a lot of freedom when drafting directly online."
"The most valuable features are hyper-linking, the Drawing Tool, and enhanced tables."
"The solution helped us to see where we were going wrong and where we were doing good, and that helped us to make proper decisions"
"The most valuable features is its design documentation abilities."
"There is a good library of templates for a wide range of needs."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The solution is stable."
"Zendesk Support has a lot of good APIs."
"Its agility and simplicity are the most valuable features. This tool is very user-friendly."
"The most valuable features of Zendesk Support are collaboration, reports, and a self-service portal. The customer and team can see all the information needed from the portal."
"It's a very stable tool, very powerful."
"The feature to move over my customer experience team tickets for different specialists is very valuable for my team."
"I found the user experience with vendors on Zendesk to be straightforward, especially when it comes to understanding and searching for specific tickets. The search and navigation tools are easy to use, and I haven't encountered any issues with delays or communication gaps in ticket resolutions."
"It has good management, the ability to sign tickets based on content, the multi-channel support, the self service portal, the integration with Salesforce, the setup process, and the product features as we are currently using them."
"The stability has been very good."
"The user interface is a little bit stale. The file attachments and how they work could be improved. There is also room for improvement when it comes to CDNs."
"I'd like to see some improved reporting on usage."
"Confluence cannot replace Microsoft Word at the moment, so even though it can be used as a document management system, it is not meant for document creation, which adds a lot of limitations to it."
"The roadmap feature should be made easier to work with and modify. It's not really scalable."
"The user interface could be improved."
"The product should have a workflow with approvals out-of-the-box."
"Some aspects of the drawing perspective could be improved. When we upgrade a design and make technical architecture drawings to publish, we still use Visio first and then copy and paste it. If this feature were available on Confluence, it would be a useful tool."
"An area for improvement would be the intuitiveness of using the features, especially if you want to customize."
"It needs to improve in terms of its flexibility, price, and installation."
"One of the drawbacks of Zendesk is that it doesn't provide a secure way for us to send data. So, we usually use a secure SharePoint folder link. We put that in the Zendesk ticket so that the requester has a secure way of getting to their data."
"The solution itself wasn't easy to set up."
"It wasn't easy to set up so we're only using a third of all of the features,"
"There is always a network issue with Zendesk. But we don’t know whether it is managed. The network issue is that when I call, it does not let us."
"Zendesk Guide's customization could be improved. I would like it to be easier and maybe open-sourced, so that if you have a developer in your company, you can do it yourself. Right now, that isn't allowed, so you need to have it done via the integrator. Another improvement—this is nit-picking—is that it could be less easy to make changes. Some things are so easy that they sometimes look a little amateur-ish. Most of the templates are built-in so they can be used directly, so they are very simple."
"As per me, there arent much significant issues or areas for improvement with Zendesk, as my usage of it is limited. I appreciate its ability to organize tickets effectively based on tags, allowing me to easily gather and analyze customer feedback and requests."
"They have something called Zendesk Explore, which isn't as good as what they had in place previously."
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 1st in Knowledge Management Software with 99 reviews while Zendesk is ranked 2nd in Knowledge Management Software with 57 reviews. Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while Zendesk is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zendesk writes "Stable tool, making it reliable for handling tasks but difficult initial setup". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Microsoft OneDrive, Office 365, SharePoint and Zoho Learn, whereas Zendesk is most compared with ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, Freshservice, Microsoft Dynamics CRM and Moveworks. See our Atlassian Confluence vs. Zendesk report.
See our list of best Knowledge Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Knowledge Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.