We performed a comparison between Atlassian SourceTree and Git based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The interface is very good and is easy to use. It tells you when you've committed, when you've uploaded, and gives you the differences."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge."
"The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."
"All of the features in Git are useful."
"The product is easy to use."
"Git is an easy-to-use solution that can be used for parallel working."
"Code versioning, for example, we work in the branch and want to come back to this branch another time.Git is a very useful tool, helpful to collaborate with other members in the group to finish more rapidly our work."
"The initial setup is very easy."
"Version control is beneficial as it allows me to keep track of all the modifications I have made to the applications."
"The tool's most valuable feature is branch workflows."
"The most valuable feature of Git is the ease of tracking in time what the snapshot of the code was at a particular moment. The versioning is good."
"For everyday use, I am more comfortable using the command line interface, rather than using SourceTree."
"Its interface could be easy to understand for a programmer."
"I have had a food experience with Atlassian SourceTree but it might not be for everyone."
"The product's UI needs improvement."
"Synchronization could be better. Sometimes when you create a branch and merge it into another branch, I think it's a bit complex for no reason. The initial setup is also tricky when you do it for the first time."
"The UI can be more user-friendly."
"I would like to see an improvement in the way the product owner can review changes."
"I would like more documentation."
"It's not very user-friendly."
"The main problem for me is the frequent upgrades in the solution because every other upgrade is a minefield. When you do the upgrade, there is always something that doesn't work."
"The platform could have a feature for monitoring data recovery similar to Azure."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing model of Git."
Atlassian SourceTree is ranked 6th in Version Control with 5 reviews while Git is ranked 4th in Version Control with 37 reviews. Atlassian SourceTree is rated 7.2, while Git is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Atlassian SourceTree writes "An easy-to-setup solution, but its documentation could be better for technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Git writes "A stable solution that can aid its users in maintaining all application developments ". Atlassian SourceTree is most compared with GitHub, Bitbucket, Bitbucket Server and AWS CodeCommit, whereas Git is most compared with Canonical Bazaar, Surround SCM, IBM Rational ClearCase, Helix Core and Liquibase. See our Atlassian SourceTree vs. Git report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.