We performed a comparison between Git and Liquibase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The best thing about this solution is that it can be learned very quickly, and used very easily."
"The most valuable feature of Git is the ease of tracking in time what the snapshot of the code was at a particular moment. The versioning is good."
"I use the solution for website management."
"Git is easy to use."
"Git is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"I believe it is beneficial to maintain a detailed log or history of who did what to a project and which user committed to the change."
"Git is a product everyone uses, so it's almost inescapable. I like the fact that there is a large ecosystem around it. You can bolt various graphical user interfaces onto it or sign up for various repositories like GitHub and AWS CodeCommit. Git has a large community, so there are lots of resources and knowledge bases you can use."
"The product protects our data."
"It will be useful for teams to automate and reduce manual work."
"They have some nice features around the automation of rule checking. They have a rules engine that checks the SQL code so that you can actually do your edit checks on the validity of the SQL code. If you don't want certain tables to be able to have certain things done to them, you can have it checked for that. It's a very flexible way to kind of do an automated peer review of the SQL code to catch things before you actually try to deploy it."
"The solution is easy to use, and it has very clear documentation."
"If the file changes are on the same line, we need to resolve a merge conflict manually. Let's say there is a merge conflict on line 50 because we have multiple commits on the same line number. Git could add some artificial intelligence to resolve the conflict automatically."
"Git can improve the size of the depository it can handle and add the capability to detect the change between common files, such as Excel and PDF documents."
"The tool is complicated for a beginner. You need to have some training to use it. It is also hard to find a parameter."
"The price could be improved."
"The platform could have a feature for monitoring data recovery similar to Azure."
"More security is always welcome in my opinion."
"I would like more documentation."
"We would like to see tutorials added to the product, for new users to follow so that they can optimize their use of the solution."
"We were not able to delete some of the tables because of a security issue."
"The pricing is quite high."
"One thing we faced issues with is that Liquibase does not show the exact error, which added to the complexity."
Earn 20 points
Git is ranked 4th in Version Control with 37 reviews while Liquibase is ranked 7th in Version Control with 3 reviews. Git is rated 8.6, while Liquibase is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Git writes "A stable solution that can aid its users in maintaining all application developments ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Liquibase writes "Offers integration with multiple databases, stable product and reduced our manual intervention". Git is most compared with Atlassian SourceTree, Canonical Bazaar, Surround SCM, IBM Rational ClearCase and Bitbucket, whereas Liquibase is most compared with Bitbucket and DBmaestro Database Source Control. See our Git vs. Liquibase report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
