We performed a comparison between AutoSys Workload Automation and Puppet Enterprise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Tidal Software by Redwood, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation."AutoSys Workload Automation is a stable solution."
"Integration with multiple services and applications across the enterprise."
"The actual scheduling of our jobs has helped us tremendously. Before it was all done manually, and we've totally automated the whole functionality, so there's no longer a case where somebody didn't run something."
"The solution has been stable."
"The capabilities of the product to schedule on multiple platforms, multiple operating systems."
"The ability to create calendars, calendering for batch jobs to run on a scheduled frequency."
"It works constantly and is pretty seamless. You do not have to open up many support tickets."
"The most valuable feature of AutoSys Workload Automation is user-friendliness. If someone has some knowledge of the tool they can use it."
"The main purpose for this automation tool would be: deploying, controlling, ordering change for the system and IT Infrastructure."
"Puppet Enterprise is a stable solution."
"Puppet Enterprise has reduced the time of production changes or environment changes."
"Puppet3 and 4 series provides optimum deployment solutions for infrastructure and applications."
"Puppet Enterprise has good functionalities."
"Anything that we manage through Puppet always runs perfectly."
"The most valuable features are the agent, high load balancing, and overall robustness and features."
"The versatility is great."
"Pricing model for distributed should have an Enterprise option."
"Documentation and cross-application externals could be improved."
"The WCC could be improved."
"To make it a lot more user-friendly, in order to make it so other people can use it without having to do much training with it; the more user-friendly it is, the easier it is to work with."
"We have to escalate through channels to get to somebody who knows what's going on. It takes time that we do not necessarily have."
"AutoSys Workload Automation could improve the integration."
"I would like to see the Service Orchestrator, a B2B product, and maybe a process audit."
"Needs better documentation with fully explained examples for some of the job types."
"At the beginning the initial setup was kind of complex."
"We would like Puppet to add more integration for applications."
"Puppet Enterprise is more complex and difficult to configure."
"Puppet Enterprise should improve the general extensibility for places where they can't install it."
"The solution has really complex code, you have to understand the Ruby language. However, once you know the code then you can move ahead without any problems."
"It's a bit of a pain point to make sure that everything works once we've upgraded it because Puppet has been evolving pretty fast."
"There's a lot of scope for enhancement on the DevSecOps side. They should definitely include features for compliance, for both the Linux and Windows side of the devices, as well as for network devices. Compliance is something they need to work on."
AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews while Puppet Enterprise doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Workload Automation with 12 reviews. AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4, while Puppet Enterprise is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Puppet Enterprise writes "A set-it-and-forget-it management solution". AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Automic Workload Automation and Stonebranch, whereas Puppet Enterprise is most compared with AWS Systems Manager, Red Hat Satellite, Microsoft Configuration Manager, BigFix and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.