We performed a comparison between AWS Firewall Manager and Palo Alto Networks Panorama based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Firewall Security Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Also, the strength of the community is invaluable."
"The interface is intuitive and it is easy for the users."
"AWS Firewall Manager isn't a separate solution when you create the virtual private cloud (VPC), so you can control the traffic through that security group."
"Once this solution is set up, we hardly have to touch it."
"It has centralized cloud firewall management rules. It provides compliance in tracking and reporting."
"The most valuable feature is the centrally managed rule. I also like the central orchestration."
"The reporting is great."
"Centralized firewall management and update management are the most valuable features."
"The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Networks Panorama is its ease of use."
"The most valuable aspect of this solution is the ability to manage our devices centrally. Additionally, we can monitor the workforce connections, receive reports, and use the backup feature."
"Technical support is helpful and knowledgeable."
"Compared to all of the other firewall vendors, Palo Alto is very secure."
"Networks Panorama has improved our organizational security"
"Centralized management is a valuable feature."
"They could consider organizing and enhancing documentation in a more structured and chronological manner"
"It needs to be more employee-friendly, and the security management could be more efficient."
"Enabling and configuring the logging is not that straightforward."
"I would like to see AWS add some UTM features to the firewall. It would also be great if AWS Firewall had native IPS/IDS. They have the separate IPS/IDS, GuardDuty."
"The system should be more customizable."
"This solution is suitable for a small-scale enterprise and may not scale up to a very high volume of traffic or a large number of servers."
"There is always room for improvement in anything."
"The current documentation is not detailed enough."
"A potential improvement for Palo Alto Networks Panorama could be a more competitive pricing structure."
"It's difficult to implement."
"They can improve its cloud integration."
"I would like more dashboard management."
"I would like to have better analytics."
"I am observing that whenever pushing our configurations sometimes the configuration will not push properly and then we have to go to the individual firewall and save it again."
AWS Firewall Manager is ranked 8th in Firewall Security Management with 6 reviews while Palo Alto Networks Panorama is ranked 3rd in Firewall Security Management with 81 reviews. AWS Firewall Manager is rated 7.8, while Palo Alto Networks Panorama is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AWS Firewall Manager writes "Streamlining security and enhanced file transfer control". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Panorama writes "Built-in proxy with the ability to maintain your own policies". AWS Firewall Manager is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate Cloud, Azure Firewall Manager, Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center, Tufin Orchestration Suite and FireMon Security Manager, whereas Palo Alto Networks Panorama is most compared with AlgoSec, Fortinet FortiGate Cloud, Tufin Orchestration Suite, Skybox Security Suite and FireMon Security Manager. See our AWS Firewall Manager vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama report.
See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.
We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.