We performed a comparison between Azure Site Recovery and VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery as a Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."They're moving a lot of their workload to cloud and aiming for a seamlessly integrated product."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"Azure Site Recovery is an easy-to-use and fairly stable solution for disaster recovery."
"Our primary use case is for disaster recovery and business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR)."
"It is a very stable product and very scalable."
"What I love about Azure Site Recovery is its simplicity for basic configurations."
"Azure Site Recovery helps to save costs."
"The most valuable feature is the visibility of what is happening with our business as well as the good reporting and dashboards."
"Technical support is very proactive and helpful."
"We feel the ability to move virtual machines while they are still running to be the most valuable feature."
"The initial setup is easy depending on the environment you are working with."
"Setting up VMs can be done quickly. It is easy to use."
"The most valuable features are the backup and disaster recovery services."
"It could include more of a backup and recovery."
"Could have more integration with other platforms."
"I conveyed the feedback to the agent, suggesting an increase in the agent count in our VNS in the USA. I also addressed notification concerns, as some issues didn't trigger alerts during a recent call."
"The solution needs to improve replication and failover processes. We are still looking for improvements in the cost baseline."
"The product's performance is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"In the newest version of Azure Site Recovery, the configuration was a little more complex, so this is an area for improvement."
"Azure Site Recovery's deployment is complex. There are a lot of bugs, and it needs to improve stability."
"I would like to see more security features."
"The automation should be simplified or improved."
"It would be ideal if they added advanced analytics or AI to the solution."
"The improvements should be as per customer requirements."
"When starting up the replication and converting it to the virtual machine I had some problems. I had to start the process again and that is inconvenient."
"VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery could improve by enhancing the network bandwidth from the storage."
More VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery Pricing and Cost Advice →
Azure Site Recovery is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 19 reviews while VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery is ranked 4th in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 5 reviews. Azure Site Recovery is rated 8.2, while VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery writes "Application can be migrated from one host to another in respects of virtual machines without the user taking notice". Azure Site Recovery is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Zerto, VMware SRM, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines, whereas VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery is most compared with Zerto, VMware SRM, Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik and AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery. See our Azure Site Recovery vs. VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery report.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery as a Service vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.