We performed a comparison between BlazeMeter and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."BlazeMeter can be used for both API and performance testing, it is a multi-facility tool."
"The feature that stands out the most is their action groups. They act like functions or methods and code, allowing us to reuse portions of our tests. That also means we have a single point for maintenance when updates are required. Instead of updating a hundred different test cases, we update one action group, and the test cases using that action group will update."
"It has a unique programming dashboard that is very user-friendly."
"For me, the best part is that we can graphically see the test result at runtime. It helps us understand the behavior of the application during all stages of the test."
"The stability is good."
"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that BlazeMeter provides easy access to its users while also ensuring that its reporting functionalities are good."
"Its most valuable features are its strong community support, user-friendly interface, and flexible capacity options."
"The most valuable aspect of BlazeMeter is its user-friendly nature, ability to conduct distributed load testing and comprehensive analysis and reporting features. It particularly excels in providing a clear and organized view of load test results."
"The documentation is easy, and it helps us solve our problems."
"It's great for the development of .NET."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability."
"The setup is easy and straightforward."
"Code testing is the most valuable feature of this solution for developing software."
"It is a very common and strong product. A lot of support is available for this product."
"I was satisfied with the support given by customer service."
"The solution is very stable."
"Having more options for customization would be helpful."
"From a performance perspective, BlazeMeter needs to be improved...BlazeMeter has not found the extensions for WebSockets or Java Applet."
"The product currently doesn't allow users to run parallel thread groups, making it an area that should be considered for improvement."
"For a new user of BlazeMeter, it might be difficult to understand it from a programming perspective."
"Lacks an option to include additional users during a test run."
"Scalability is an area of concern in BlazeMeter, where improvements are required."
"The performance could be better. When reviewing finished cases, it sometimes takes a while for BlazeMeter to load. That has improved recently, but it's still a problem with unusually large test cases. The same goes for editing test cases. When editing test cases, it starts to take a long time to open those action groups and stuff."
"The seamless integration with mobiles could be improved."
"The solution's deployment is not very easy and should be made easier."
"We would like to be able to easily integrate this solution with our continuous integration tools, such as Jenkins."
"The interface should be made attractive."
"The vendor must release a lightweight version of the solution."
"The documents on the Microsoft website are not very useful, and they ought to make it easier to find answers."
"The price could be improved."
"The solution should be cheaper."
"The solution can improve the startup time."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
BlazeMeter is ranked 8th in Functional Testing Tools with 41 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 6th in Functional Testing Tools with 48 reviews. BlazeMeter is rated 8.2, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of BlazeMeter writes "Reduced our test operating costs, provides quick feedback, and helps us understand how to build better test cases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". BlazeMeter is most compared with Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, OpenText LoadRunner Professional and BrowserStack, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and Tricentis Tosca. See our BlazeMeter vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
