We performed a comparison between Tricentis NeoLoad and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools."The most valuable feature is flexibility, as it connects to all of the endpoints that we need it to."
"The licensing cost is very less for NeoLoad. It is user-friendly and easy to understand because they have created so many useful functionalities. When I started working with this tool, we just had to do the initial assessment about whether this tool will be able to support our daily work or not. I could easily understand it. I didn't have to search Google or watch YouTube videos. In just 15 to 20 minutes, I was able to understand the tool."
"Tricentis NeoLoad is quite easy to use as compared to JMeter."
"I feel that the codeless part, the dynamic value capture part is quite easy in NeoLoad compared to other tools."
"We appreciate that this solution is very user-friendly, even if the user does not have a lot of protocol knowledge and experience."
"It is a good source for load, stress and performance testing."
"In my opinion, correlation of dynamic data is the most important advantage of this tool."
"There aren't other solutions as competitive as Tricentis NeoLoad when it comes to the performance side."
"Its initial setup process is easy."
"One of the best documentation in the world."
"It's great for the development of .NET."
"We are satisfied with technical support. Communicating with them is very simple. We also have a lot of online resources to check and to study and to train our team with. The documentation is very clear and readily available."
"Code testing is the most valuable feature of this solution for developing software."
"It is a very common and strong product. A lot of support is available for this product."
"The solution is very stable; there's nothing in relation to stability to complain about."
"The solution is very stable."
"I would like to see support for auto-correlations."
"It would be good to make some updates on the reporting side."
"I didn't like much of the support that you get from the Tricentis group unless it was after it integrated with Tricentis; the support is not that good."
"We would like NeoLoad to be able to support more protocols. Testing can also be a little tricky at times."
"It needs improvements in the UI. It's currently not as friendly as it should be."
"We would like to see the addition of one-to-one integrations with the Tricentis Tosca suite to this product, which would then cover the end-to-end needs of our customers who are looking for a single vendor solution."
"Support wasn't able to solve a technical issue."
"Tricentis NeoLoad could improve the terminal emulation mainframe. It is not able to use the low code or no code option. You have to code it yourself."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a little pricey."
"The price could be improved."
"The solution can improve the startup time."
"The database administration could be better; you should be able to choose new tools with the development environment in Visual Studio. It could be easier to use."
"Sometimes, the solution hangs, so its performance could be improved."
"In Visual Studio we still don't have anything which can pinpoint memory leaks on a certain code line."
"The interface should be made attractive."
"The service right now is far too expensive. You need to pay per user."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 3rd in Performance Testing Tools with 62 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 6th in Functional Testing Tools with 48 reviews. Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 8.2, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes " Maintenance will be easy, pretty straightforward to learn and flexible". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Apache JMeter, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, Tricentis Tosca and Akamai CloudTest, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, SmartBear TestComplete, Tricentis Tosca and TestRail.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
