We performed a comparison between BMC TrueSight Operations Management and Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool is flexible enough to be customized based on customer requirements."
"The Event Management is outstanding; still is the most interesting part of the product."
"It has provided us with a single location to host all events to be viewed/monitored by our NOC. This has greatly helped them to streamline their processes."
"I like the event management part."
"The ability to pull hosts together to show what processes are running, so it can be used for change management."
"The event management tool builds correlation logic and protection algorithms into a field of events that is valuable when a data center goes down."
"Intelligent solution with a proactive monitoring feature and consolidated dashboard that's stable and easy to scale."
"The tailoring of the knowledge modules has been particularly useful as I can streamline the agents to only report on critical events."
"It is very easy to monitor multiple cloud environments. It's like a single pane of glass for us. We can use it to monitor our on-prem and both of our cloud environments as opposed to having different tools for each environment. It makes it all come together in one tool."
"The most valuable feature is log reporting."
"Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring gives us complete visibility without the need for storage."
"The data collection from our VMs, containers, databases, and backend components is valuable."
"The initial setup was straightforward. We didn't find it to be too complex."
"The alerts are the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature in this solution is the log searching."
"The solution's basic visibility is one of its most valuable features. So, it is a solution that is easy to use...The solution's initial setup process was straightforward."
"The product must provide application or service monitoring features."
"The stability of BMC TrueSight Operations Management needs improvement. My organization's infrastructure is vast and implemented based on BMC recommendations, but the solution needs to be optimized for large-capacity infrastructure."
"BMC's solutions for cloud monitoring (monitoring of AWS and Azure resources) are very poor in stability and customization."
"I would really like to see out-of-the-box support for monitoring uninterruptible power supplies."
"The UI for the end users could be improved and more flexible than it is now."
"The dashboard and performance graphs should include a way to automatically schedule and export reports."
"I would like them to improve the deep-dive details, tracing, and data agents in this product. We have EUEM, an end-user experience monitoring appliance. This one's quicker than the current one, and reporting side and filtration side are very bad. There are many details we look at and explain what we receive information in the current one, but we cannot have historical data like we do with EUEM. We cannot have a powerful point to look for specific traffic from a specific application and a specific browser. We don't have it in the new one. The current BMC also needs to add the thing that control versions."
"BMC TrueSight Operations Management could use some enhancements in the application visibility tools."
"There is a lot of room for improvement with the automation."
"The clustering part of indexes can be more refined."
"The cost needs to be re-examined. It's extremely expensive to run. It's also expensive to expand. That's the number one complaint all of my customers have when it comes to Splunk. It's way too expensive compared to other solutions."
"It's a bit difficult to use. It takes some time to get into it and to get it to do what you would like it to do. It is not straightforward to use it."
"In the next release, I would like to see more integration with other solutions."
"The solution should have more sensors regarding fiber intelligence for security measures."
"It does not have a user-friendly interface and it is difficult to use."
"It would be useful if they provided some help pages. If you don't know too much about the tool, there should be more documentation readily available. It would be useful if they had a help button embedded in the solution so you could ask questions and get answers."
More BMC TrueSight Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Pricing and Cost Advice →
BMC TrueSight Operations Management is ranked 19th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 50 reviews while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is ranked 15th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 24 reviews. BMC TrueSight Operations Management is rated 8.2, while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of BMC TrueSight Operations Management writes "The product is reasonably priced, but the solution is a little obsolete because it is deployed on-premise". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring writes "Helps to ingest a massive amount of raw data and use it effectively". BMC TrueSight Operations Management is most compared with BMC Helix Monitor, Dynatrace, ServiceNow IT Operations Management, Zabbix and New Relic, whereas Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is most compared with ServiceNow IT Operations Management, Nagios XI, Amazon CloudWatch, Cisco Intersight and ITRS Geneos. See our BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
