We performed a comparison between BrowserStack and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The setup was quite simple. The website easily explains how to set it up and if you want to integrate it with BMP tools there are online simple step tutorials."
"Local testing for products with no public exposure is an advantage in development."
"Testing across devices and browsers without maintaining that inventory is invaluable."
"The main core concept behind this product is, it takes the overhead of maintaining all of your devices or particular computers. It continuously adds the latest devices that are coming into the market."
"I like that it offers full device capability."
"The most valuable feature is that it provides parallel and cross-browser testing. It enables us to run tests on multiple browsers or devices simultaneously."
"The most valuable feature of BrowserStack is the ability to do manual testing."
"I have found that BrowserStack is stable."
"The most valuable features of Visual Studio Test Professional are the IntelliSense and the ease of adding the NuGet packages."
"Performance-wise, it is a great tool."
"It is very easy to use. You can handle a lot of things together at once in one package, which is a good point for us."
"Code testing is the most valuable feature of this solution for developing software."
"Visual Studio is the easiest to use."
"Visual Studio Test Pro is super helpful for my Microsoft app work."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a very scalable solution."
"The most valuable feature has been to store all our packages in one place including SSIS packages, SQL tables, TFS and SSR."
"It is difficult to use for someone who has little to no experience."
"I would like to see clearer visibility."
"Connectivity can sometimes mar the testing experience."
"We are struggling to do local testing."
"BrowserStack is scalable, but cost is significant for those living in Mexico."
"BrowserStack should work on its Internet connectivity although issues only occur occasionally."
"BrowserStack operates at a slow pace, it could improve by making it faster."
"Customer support could be better. We tried to implement and explore this product with the vendor or reseller's help, but we haven't had any good response about the product."
"The pricing of this solution should be lowered."
"Visual Studio Test Professional could improve by having better integration with external databases."
"The integration with Git needs improving because it is a bit disjointed and unpredictable."
"The product must provide more automation."
"Sometimes, the product is too complex to use."
"The solution can improve the startup time."
"The server that we use is very slow so that is concerning for us."
"The database administration could be better; you should be able to choose new tools with the development environment in Visual Studio. It could be easier to use."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
BrowserStack is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 25 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 48 reviews. BrowserStack is rated 8.0, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of BrowserStack writes "Good in the area of automation and offers a high test coverage to users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". BrowserStack is most compared with LambdaTest, Sauce Labs, Perfecto, Tricentis Tosca and CrossBrowserTesting, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and Tricentis Tosca. See our BrowserStack vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
