We performed a comparison between Check Point Remote Access VPN and TeamViewer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Remote Access solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Scalability is great. We have been able to grow as a corporation due in part to this type of solution."
"The solution offers great security features, including zero-day protection, malware protection, anti-phishing, et cetera."
"Setting policies allow, block, and limit users' access."
"Thanks to all these security processes, our users can access our infrastructure with the certainty that we will not be compromised."
"Access is browser-based only and requires no additional client installation."
"For a basic setup, implementation is quite easy."
"I like the fact that Remote Access allows the administrator to control and manage things. It makes things smoother, and it has been an excellent experience."
"The ability to create your trigger data domains is the solution's most valuable feature."
"The product and platform work well. That is why I have stay with them so long. The stability has typically been good."
"The most valuable feature of TeamViewer is the remote access connection. Additionally, it is easy to use."
"It's pretty easy to use. Just key in an ID and password and connect. For meetings, just enter the meeting ID and connect."
"I don't know of any performance problems with TeamViewer - generally, it's a stable product."
"I have been satisfied with TeamViewer overall."
"I recommend it as a solution for remote disk users."
"It is a scalable product."
"The best feature is the remote access and being able to control another person's computer when you're showing them something, or teaching them how to do something during training, or fixing a problem they're having."
"The cost of maintenance is high compared to most products in the market."
"It would be good to have Remote Access VPN solutions for Check Point edge services."
"The scalability needs improvement."
"For Linux machines, they don't have a full client to install. For the users that utilize Linux, there needs to be an equivalent."
"The provisioning of VPN users has room for improvement."
"Improvements for Check Point Remote Access VPN could include enhancing mobile connectivity for a smoother user experience."
"Improved scalability would allow the solution to handle larger numbers of users and devices without a significant impact on performance."
"They could add more features, like the security to block off the doors, or create another hatch, something like this. They could make the features safer, add malware to make my mail and the Kryon system safer and to protect data at an earlier stage."
"TeamViewer can improve by making the interface more user-friendly. It looks very basic, they can make it more modern and easy to use."
"TeamViewer could improve by having support for other operating systems, such as Linux."
"The security could improve in TeamViewer."
"This solution could be improved by offering more flexibility in terms of usage."
"In the next release, I would prefer to have a voice integration and collaboration feature to support multiple teams simultaneously."
"It's pretty limited on the options they have."
"TeamViewer is publicly available and anyone can use it. This is the reason that many organizations do not permit the use of this solution. It is not considered to be secure enough."
"A feature that they could add is chat with sound to talk."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 5th in Remote Access with 61 reviews while TeamViewer is ranked 1st in Remote Access with 85 reviews. Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8, while TeamViewer is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamViewer writes "Solid cross-platform remote control, but with kludgy central management and some serious feature issues on macOS". Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Check Point Harmony Mobile, Fortinet FortiClient and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, whereas TeamViewer is most compared with TeamViewer Tensor, Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, Parallels Access, ISL Online and HelpWire. See our Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. TeamViewer report.
See our list of best Remote Access vendors.
We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.