We performed a comparison between Check Point Remote Access VPN and TeamViewer Tensor based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Remote Access solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is easy to install, centrally managed, and stable, with good technical support and a straightforward setup."
"Our number of users working remotely vastly increased during the COVID 19 pandemic. Check Point Remote Access VPN allowed us to quickly make the transition from in-office to remote work."
"A single login based on a second authentication factor is giving us the possibility of integrating third-party services for authentication based on a security scheme."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN has some useful features, and configuring it is relatively straightforward."
"It is stable most of the time."
"For us, it was essential to integrate with Active Directory, which is our credentials repository."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN is a stable solution."
"The solution implemented in the cloud allows us to easily scale in cases of user increase."
"This product is very simple to use and you can connect whether you are behind a firewall or not."
"Remote desktop sharing is one valuable feature of the solution."
"The most valuable feature of TeamViewer Tensor is the remote access."
"The connection has gotten less smooth as the number of users increases. The issue is that the logs fill up quickly. Too many users are connecting remotely. It worked great when we only had a few remote connections. Now, it is disconnecting people and dropping the internet connection."
"A characteristic to improve is the communication service under the SMTP scheme."
"Improvements for Check Point Remote Access VPN could include enhancing mobile connectivity for a smoother user experience."
"I would like this service to be easier to manage when you integrate it with third parties."
"Compliance Check on Check Point should be improved by having more configurable conditions to support multi-platforms and adding more granularity."
"The main area for improvement is pricing. Another area could be integrating MFA authentication directly into the solution instead of using separate benchmark tools for implementation."
"We encounter challenges for the product’s installation and troubleshooting processes compared to other VPN products."
"There were some issues with automation and instability."
"The solution could include more AI (Artificial Intelligence)."
"Having the ability to create subgroups and delegate permissions to the group members would be a helpful addition."
"The SSO feature of the solution may sometimes not function perfectly…Pricing might be improved for TeamViewer Tensor."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 5th in Remote Access with 62 reviews while TeamViewer Tensor is ranked 7th in Remote Access with 4 reviews. Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8, while TeamViewer Tensor is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamViewer Tensor writes "A user-friendly and stable solution providing remote desktop sharing functionality to its users". Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Fortinet FortiClient, Check Point Harmony Mobile and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, whereas TeamViewer Tensor is most compared with TeamViewer, TeamViewer Pilot, BeyondTrust Remote Support, Parallels Access and LogMeIn Rescue. See our Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. TeamViewer Tensor report.
See our list of best Remote Access vendors.
We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.