We performed a comparison between Coralogix and MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."A non-tech person can easily get used to it."
"The solution is easy to use and to start with."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."
"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."
"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."
"The stability overall has been pretty great."
"The ease of policy maintenance and API functionality are key features for me. They streamline business processes by allowing configurable control over policies, instead of writing codes and making maintenance more straightforward."
"The scalability is good. It's passable."
"It provides various advantages in the integration field, including support for Azure services and cloud integrations."
"Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager's most valuable aspect is it has plenty of features."
"MuleSoft has given the API solution a 3-tiered architecture. This means that there are multiple channels available in one application. The usability is very high."
"The security features are good. It's easy to configure the end-to-end integration with existing applications."
"MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is a low-code product."
"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."
"The documentation of the tool could be improved"
"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."
"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."
"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."
"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."
"There should be more pricing options or certain discounts for the education sector."
"MuleSoft has advanced features but is slower."
"When discussing potential enhancements overall, it primarily involves making it more user-friendly and lowering the pricing. There are several aspects that could benefit from improvement, or perhaps a few other areas to consider."
"Better documentation to help explain each of the features would be really helpful."
"When compared to other integration technologies, it is slightly higher."
"To improve Anypoint API Manager for the next release, it should focus on better consumption scalability, especially for smaller APIs."
"The setup process could be simpler."
"Their analytics needs a lot of improvement. It's really lacking right now."
More MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Coralogix is ranked 16th in API Management with 7 reviews while MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is ranked 4th in API Management with 49 reviews. Coralogix is rated 8.4, while MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Coralogix writes "Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager writes "Responsive technical support, low tickets issued showing great stability, and limitless expansion". Coralogix is most compared with Datadog, Grafana, Sentry and New Relic, whereas MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, Amazon API Gateway, Apigee, IBM API Connect and Kong Gateway Enterprise. See our Coralogix vs. MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.