We performed a comparison between Cortex XSIAM and IBM Security QRadar based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, CrowdStrike, Securonix Solutions and others in Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR)."It operates on a single, extensive database which enables it to excel in detecting threats and anomalies across the network and endpoints, delivering a highly effective and comprehensive security solution."
"The most valuable features of Cortex XSIAM are the machine learning used to identify threats, the complexity of the environment of products, and efficiency."
"Its ability to deliver a substantial amount of security intelligence greatly enhances and optimizes our security operations program."
"It is an effective solution in terms of performance and functionalities."
"The tool is already automated in many ways, but there are some additional functions which should be automated, like sending an email, mobile notification, and integration of XFS."
"The most valuable features of IBM Security QRadar are flexibility, IBM support, and scalability."
"The simplicity of the solution is the best feature."
"The tool helps with infrastructure, application, and network monitoring."
"IBM Security QRadar has significantly improved our incident response procedures."
"The playbook engine is flexible and allows for the graphical visualization of processes, enabling the implementation of dynamic playbooks for incident response or testing."
"This solution has excellent security analytics."
"The initial setup of QRadar is not complex because we have done it before and we are used to the development. It is getting easier all the time."
"The platform isn't very developer-friendly and it should provide more flexibility and ease."
"The support could be a bit faster."
"The solution’s pricing and technical support could be improved."
"Further integration capabilities with various other software products that can seamlessly tie into Cortex XSIAM would be advantageous."
"The advanced planning management (APM) features should be included."
"The initial setup requires that you have somebody with the proper skill set, and it would help if the configuration were easier."
"The solution lacks some maturity."
"The product does not have a team for investigating malware."
"I would like to see a more user-friendly product."
"While the interface is easy to use, it could be a little more responsive."
"The released patch quality is poor. IBM should test those patches on their side, not on the client's side."
"The pricing of the solution is a bit high. If they could lower it, that would be ideal."
Cortex XSIAM is ranked 7th in Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) with 4 reviews while IBM Security QRadar is ranked 4th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 198 reviews. Cortex XSIAM is rated 9.0, while IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cortex XSIAM writes "A robust security operation that ensures achieving automation, stability, and scalability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". Cortex XSIAM is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, CrowdStrike Falcon and Exabeam Fusion SIEM, whereas IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and ArcSight Logger.
We monitor all Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.