We performed a comparison between CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault and Delinea Secret Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Password Managers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The accounts are maintained automatically. Hence, resource and administration costs are less."
"The most valuable feature is privileged session management."
"If properly set up, CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault has good stability, and is a very solid tool. It can run by itself. Its most valuable features are auto password recycling and PSM."
"CyberArk has a lot of modules."
"The password protection itself is the most important feature. It's something we didn't have before."
"Our most valuable features would probably be key rotation, the SKM or SSH key manager, and account discovery."
"The logs and reporting features are impressive."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it's the best in the market. I haven't seen any other PAM solutions better than CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault."
"The solution is good."
"Its most valuable feature is its main purpose - the password changing and the Heartbeat so the user has access to only their SVN and does not have access to any other. Thycotic's access privileged management tool allows you to grant access to users for a specific period of time and with specific attributes and privileges."
"I find it really easy and computer confident, and the experience with the product is really good. Additionally, customizations are easy."
"The most valuable feature of Delinea Secret Server is secret password management."
"Delinea's network integration is the most useful. For example, I use a Check Point firewall connect to SmartConsole, so I need to do a lot of configuration in Delinea Secret Server. Native integration with Check Point is valuable. You can also go download whatever API you need from the cloud, whether you're using Check Point, Palo Alto, etc. Enriched discovery is another good feature. If you are dealing with several kinds of systems, you can see which system requires privileged access to my network."
"The surveillance is most valuable."
"What I like best about this product is the interface."
"Its technical support is good."
"The solution is too big and complex for any businesses that are small or medium-sized. They should offer a more compact version or make a solution better suited to smaller businesses."
"Having a cloud version would be very helpful. You have to invest a lot of money for the infrastructure hardware so the cloud version would help."
"Enhanced PSM support for Java based applications."
"The stability depends on the infrastructure it is installed on, which is important because CyberArk does not have the hardware appliance."
"The challenge with the product is pricing since it's expensive. It also needs to improve the customization. We encountered some stability issues as well."
"We require IAM (identify and access management) capability at the administrator level because we need more identification."
"The session monitoring and recording feature is also a good feature feature, but we're currently experiencing an issue with session monitoring not working correctly. We're working with CyberArk to resolve it. We aren't able to view active sessions or historical recordings of sessions."
"There was a situation when one of our presidents had an issue, but I can't recall the specifics."
"I'd prefer a better commercial model that includes partners and options for consulting around it. Where I've worked with my customers, we've only been able to use their professional services, and that has been a risk and constraint."
"The integration with the ticketing system ServiceNow is complex."
"We faced some upgrade issues, especially during the management and administration parts. I found it less straightforward than on many other platforms, even outside password managers."
"Delinea Secret Server can improve by extending the monitoring policies and making the performance better."
"They could improve the container platform and SPO."
"In many PAM tools, when users request a password checkout, they need to provide justification. However, in my experience across four organizations, nobody actually reads the justifications. Users can simply type anything and get the password. This becomes a risk and compliance issue. There needs to be continuous improvement in this area, focusing on problem identification and mitigation strategies."
"The initial setup and deployment can be cumbersome. It's not an easy process."
"What needs improvement? The product can be improved by reducing the number of updates provided."
More CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is ranked 4th in Enterprise Password Managers with 48 reviews while Delinea Secret Server is ranked 6th in Enterprise Password Managers with 47 reviews. CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is rated 8.4, while Delinea Secret Server is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault writes "Helps to store system accounts ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Delinea Secret Server writes "Effective for password rotation policies triggered by audit requirements, it helps maintain compliance standards and seamless integration with third-party tools ". CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is most compared with Azure Key Vault, HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, BeyondTrust Password Safe and LastPass, whereas Delinea Secret Server is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Azure Key Vault, HashiCorp Vault, IBM Security Secret Server and WALLIX Bastion. See our CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault vs. Delinea Secret Server report.
See our list of best Enterprise Password Managers vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Password Managers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
