We performed a comparison between CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault and HashiCorp Vault based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Password Managers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Password Vault's policy configuration is very good - when you receive an attack, you can segment the structure of the project in order to isolate parts or users."
"I love how easily we could operate within Password Vault and get things done. It was almost effortless."
"The password rotation and cyber gateway have been quite useful."
"Our most valuable features would probably be key rotation, the SKM or SSH key manager, and account discovery."
"CyberArk's GUI is user friendly."
"The ability to monitor privileged accounts throughout the enterprises."
"The most valuable feature is privileged session management."
"The PSM is excellent and the ability to write your own connectors and plugins is invaluable as far as flexibility goes."
"It is a good product to consider for companies who are looking to build on-premise or hybrid infrastructure."
"It is an added value for our customers to have a Secrets Management workflow available that is PaaS/CaaS/KaaS Platform agnostic."
"The product is free and easy to use. It is well documented with an easy implementation process."
"It's stable. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten."
"It can still be configured by a separate team other than developers. That's why I think it's more secure."
"The feature I find most beneficial in HashiCorp Vault is the secret engine. It integrates smoothly with many applications, making it easy to set up and implement quickly. This allows you to test it easily and see good results rapidly. When you integrate an internal API or application, it quickly manages that application's secrets."
"This solution is easy to use and to integrate."
"The most valuable feature of HashiCorp Vault is the management of tickets in the pipeline."
"CyberArk has two disadvantages; the first is that it's insanely expensive and the other is it's very complex."
"It is complicated to deploy for Windows servers compared to other vendors."
"The tool needs to improve its usage and interface. They need to have a modern and useful interface. I want the product to improve its integration capabilities as well since some of the integration features do not work always."
"The tool's UI has bugs and lags. It needs to be improved. The deployment process can be complex due to multiple components for various functionalities, each requiring separate infrastructure management. To simplify this process, consolidating all these components into a single platform could be beneficial. The product's pricing could be cheaper."
"The challenge with the product is pricing since it's expensive. It also needs to improve the customization. We encountered some stability issues as well."
"I would like to see more integration with more tools, for more APIs."
"Password Vault is much pricier than other solutions. A vendor team might struggle to explain why that price is justified. There are good alternatives that cost less."
"The only problem involves granting access to people who are authorized to view it."
"The solution could be much easier to implement."
"There could be a plugin for the database to change the secret automatically. It would be an efficient feature for password security."
"I don't think there are any major improvements required—so far, so good. However, I think that having more training materials, such as videos, and documentation available would be helpful. I would prefer to have more videos available either on the official site or on YouTube."
"The product needs to improve its customization. It should be also more like easy to plug and play."
"In my opinion, HashiCorp Vault could improve its user interface. Right now, they don't offer much in terms of a graphical interface, which means you usually have to manage things manually through API calls. I think CyberArk has a better approach because it provides a UI that integrates features across all its components, making it easier, especially for new users or those from organizations with strict licensing policies."
"We could use more documentation, primarily to do with integrations."
"It would be helpful to have more advanced features."
"A drawback for some clients who have to be PCI compliant is that they still need to use and subscribe to an HSM (Hardware Security Module) solution."
More CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is ranked 4th in Enterprise Password Managers with 48 reviews while HashiCorp Vault is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Password Managers with 16 reviews. CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is rated 8.4, while HashiCorp Vault is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault writes "Helps to store system accounts ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HashiCorp Vault writes "Useful for machine-to-machine communication and has secret engine feature ". CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is most compared with Azure Key Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Delinea Secret Server, BeyondTrust Password Safe and LastPass, whereas HashiCorp Vault is most compared with Azure Key Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Keeper, Delinea Secret Server and BeyondTrust Password Safe. See our CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault vs. HashiCorp Vault report.
See our list of best Enterprise Password Managers vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Password Managers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.