We performed a comparison between Cynet and ESET Endpoint Security based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Cynet offers strong ransomware protection and an intuitive interface. ESET Endpoint Security is highly regarded for its encryption capabilities, effortless automatic updates, and intuitive interface. Cynet needs to expand device support and add customization options. Users suggest improving network monitoring and strengthening integration with other tools. ESET Endpoint Security has room for improvement in terms of faster threat alerts, automation, and ransomware protection.
Service and Support: Cynet's customer service is consistently lauded for its excellence. They have a dedicated support team that is available round the clock, and they also have a contingency plan for urgent incidents. ESET's customer service is praised for its helpfulness and quick response.
Ease of Deployment: Cynet’s setup is highly efficient, with the ability to configure thousands of devices quickly. The setup process for ESET Endpoint Security is generally regarded as effortless.
Pricing: Customers generally think Cynet is affordable and a good value for its features. ESET Endpoint Security is considered to be reasonably priced with various licensing options.
ROI: Cynet yields an excellent ROI by preventing cyberattacks and safeguarding sensitive data. Some reported a high ROI from ESET Endpoint Security due to cost savings, while others find it difficult to measure its effectiveness.
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"This is stable and scalable."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"The dashboard is beautiful, overall easy of use, and the UBA and NBA features are valued."
"Cynet's most valuable features are laptop and server performance, internal network monitoring, and external firewall lock management."
"We are using almost all of the features and we find it quite good overall."
"We are protecting all our workstations."
"A reliable security system that automatically quarantines anything suspicious."
"I like that you can implement it in the managed service portfolio."
"The interface is exceptionally clear and easy to understand."
"I have found the continued support and pretty much all the features to be valuable. They all stand out as being positive. It continues to detect unusual activity when it's supposed to, and so far we haven't had any issues."
"The software and hardware inventory that you can create by using the console is valuable. It is also very light on hardware resources."
"The tools and the features available with this solution are very competitive. It is always updated to prevent upcoming attacks."
"ESET provides good protection."
"It can scale as well."
"In terms of the current global landscape, it is a great solution."
"ESET Endpoint Security is stable. When comparing the solution to competitors it is more stable."
"The most valuable feature of ESET Endpoint Security is the antivirus for the endpoints."
"The most valuable features are the sandbox, mail scanning, sandboxing attachments, files, and that it responds to VPN porting."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"We've encountered challenges during API deployment, occasionally resulting in unstable environments."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"I would like to see support for mobile protection and some additional reports included."
"It is an endpoint agent, but they don't have a probe for checking the network traffic. They could improve from this point of view."
"Most of their times are in Greenwich Mean Time. I would like to see more local time zones."
"Cynet could improve when a reverse proxy is being used to connect to the servers. There could be an easier configuration because it is not plug-and-play."
"We'd like something that makes it easier to manage specific points."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support. The support should be faster to respond."
"I cannot provide more details about Cynet's automation features. While Cynet claims to be automated, the specifics of this automation are unclear. They claim to have a high capability to detect and block attacks, but I am cautious about companies that claim to solve every problem without limitations. It does help in identifying malware on the network but doesn't specifically identify vulnerabilities."
"I think the technical support could be better."
"We have experienced some problems with the actualization of some endpoints. We then have to manually reinstall the version on these endpoints."
"The adware module could be improved."
"The solution could improve by having higher-level security and reporting."
"In terms of what is lacking in ESET, it really would need more features for the users when they are working outside of the corporate network."
"Data Leak Protection is is what we are searching for at the moment. It is not included with ESET."
"The user interface of ESET Endpoint Security could be more user-friendly and more features could be added."
"They recently released an EDR integration. I hope they have more AI or intelligence filtering on the EDR events. Even though it has already got AI, but it is quite a different thing. So, they still have room to improve on the EDR part. This is one small piece that they need to improve. Otherwise, it is just fine."
"It can be hard to set up if you need to customize it."
More ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cynet is ranked 17th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 35 reviews while ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is ranked 11th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 99 reviews. Cynet is rated 8.8, while ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cynet writes "Provides memory protection, device control, and vulnerability management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ESET Endpoint Protection Platform writes "Easy to set up with good security and rapidly improving capabilities". Cynet is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Check Point Harmony Endpoint, whereas ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. See our Cynet vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.