We performed a comparison between Datadog and WhatsUp Gold based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Datadog offers valuable features like dashboards, reporting, error reporting, log centralization, user-friendliness for development teams, and flexibility with AI and ML capabilities. WhatsUp Gold is highly valued for its ability to automatically scan for rogue devices, cost-effectiveness, NetFlow monitoring, and server health and uptime. Datadog could enhance its usability, integration, user interface, learning curve, external website monitoring, and SSL security. WhatsUp Gold could improve its release cadence, clarity of point system, real-time monitoring, configuration management, and integration with different vendors.
Service and Support: The customer service for Datadog has been commended for its prompt and readily available assistance. Users have reported receiving instant responses and timely support. However, there have been instances of slow or unresponsive support, particularly in the Asia-Pacific region. WhatsUp Gold customer service has received a range of feedback. Some users have praised the technical support as excellent and helpful while others have encountered challenges in reaching out to support and have noted a scarcity of certified engineers in certain countries.
Ease of Deployment: Users find the initial setup of Datadog to be simple and uncomplicated, often receiving help from service providers or technical support. WhatsUp Gold's setup process is also described as uncomplicated and straightforward, especially for smaller teams.
Pricing: Datadog's setup cost has mixed opinions, with some users finding it expensive while others find it reasonable. The pricing model can be confusing and may become costly if certain features are extensively used. WhatsUp Gold offers clear pricing per device per year, without any hidden fees. Its price is considered good and reasonable, and licenses are perpetual and auto-renewable.
ROI: Users have reported experiencing varying levels of ROI with Datadog. Some have mentioned that they have achieved high ROI through time savings and faster debugging. However, there is no specific mention of the ROI for WhatsUp Gold, and the user reviews for this product vary.
Comparison Results: Datadog emerges as the preferred choice when compared to WhatsUp Gold. Users highly appreciate the ease of use and setup of Datadog, along with its impressive dashboards, error reporting, log centralization, and troubleshooting features. Its user-friendliness for development teams, user interface, integrations, and observability capabilities are also valued.
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"It provides more cloud data. They tend to just get the way a service would be designed on the cloud."
"The solution has improved the organization by providing good insights into app performance and offering good dashboards."
"It is great that creating an incident is possible from Slack while having all the relevant data in Datadog."
"We really like the charts and visualization."
"The dashboards and the performance of the software have been great."
"By moving to Datadog, we did not need to manage our own monitoring infrastructure anymore."
"We integrate our application logs. It is great to be able to tie our metrics and our traces together."
"Datadog has so far been a breeze to use and set up."
"I use it on premises to monitor my network database. We monitor the link up/down and use the SNMP traps as well."
"The most valuable features are network bandwidth monitoring and monitoring device health."
"The interactive mapping interface for scrolling, zooming, and drilling down on an element to learn about a network issue is good. When we see a network there will sometimes be a spot that has one link. You can go into a particular part of the topology map, scroll in, and see exactly which module it is."
"It handles the basics of monitoring."
"The documentation is very good."
"The installation and configuration process are easy."
"The user interface is good enough."
"Auto scanning is most valuable. It looks for rogue devices on your network."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"Datadog lacks a deeper application-level insight. Their competitors had eclipsed them in offering ET functionality that was important to us. That's why we stopped using it and switched to New Relic. Datadog's price is also high."
"Auto instrumentation on tracing has not been very easy to find in the documentation."
"Managing dashboards as IaC is a bit hard to work out at times."
"The current way accounts are billed could be vastly improved - especially when involving multiple organizations across multiple accounts in combination with reserved commitments."
"I found the solution to be stable, I did not experience any bugs or glitches. However, some of the managing team did."
"Some of the interface is still confusing to use."
"I often have issues with the UI in my browser."
"Datadog has a lot of features kind of cramped into one dashboard. It's quite hard to get around what feature does exactly what. There was a steep learning curve, trying to navigate through menus."
"Regional product team support is not very good."
"One of the biggest things that made us start to look at another product is we're not able to have an end to end monitoring from a user perspective throughout the system and back to the user. All the monitoring is from inside out, we need something that also can give us from outside in."
"Importing the maps and being able to customize them could be easier."
"I might like to see a better interface in the future."
"WhatsUp Gold should work on real-time monitoring and configuration management. If they succeed in doing this, the solution will cover all the network troubleshooting aspects and will be a benefit."
"Integrations with other devices. I want to have a product that has full integration with my active directory so I can track user activity. I want to track my complete user activity, so I'm looking for a product to implement in the near future, which will have full integration with my network and active directory users. It became very difficult to track user activity."
"The new release cadence needs to be improved. It takes a while for them to add new features and functionality. There should be a quicker turnaround with new versions."
"The licensing model could be improved. Right now, the levels are too far apart. This causes the solution to be more expensive than it needs to be."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Datadog is ranked 1st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 137 reviews while WhatsUp Gold is ranked 31st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 22 reviews. Datadog is rated 8.6, while WhatsUp Gold is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WhatsUp Gold writes "If CPU, memory, or disk space is over-utilized, it alerts us immediately via text or email if there is an issue". Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and Elastic Observability, whereas WhatsUp Gold is most compared with Grafana, SolarWinds NPM, Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor and Nagios XI. See our Datadog vs. WhatsUp Gold report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors, best Network Monitoring Software vendors, and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.