We performed a comparison between Dynatrace and JenniferSoft based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."The full stack - Everything from the browser, all the way back to the database, and being able to see everything, and really narrow in very quickly on what is the root cause."
"It helps us get to the resolution quicker, and potentially the root cause, and at least understand what is happening for future identification."
"Ease of problem detection and alerting, visual timeline, and user-sessions are some of the best features of Dynatrace."
"It helps to show where the problem is and isolates the issue."
"Our company gets quick response times and qualified responses from technical support, so that is good."
"We also use it in our performance testing. We found an issue that way, and we would have put that change live without Dynatrace. Finding that problem in "live", that would have been three or four days of investigation, whereas we found the issue, fixed the issue, reran the tests, all same day."
"Logs files for JVM transactions help to debug most of the failures."
"Reduced MTTR, thanks to smart problem detection and automated root cause analysis."
"The dashboard is a valuable feature."
"I think they're working on even more integration from external third party input, but that is ongoing. So the faster it's there the better. Clock monitoring is one of these areas where improvements can be made."
"It could be more affordable and therefore, more widely used by including more features like DEM as part of licensing cost rather than an additional expense."
"I would like to see the ability to pull more user-friendly reports."
"The integration of the tools is getting there. It is still not there yet, because we still have to get a lot of tools to put together."
"I did like the old dashboards, the legacy 6.3 for example; the way we were able to do the dashboarding in the client. I would like to be able to see that in the new version of Dynatrace."
"If you want to see a month's data, it keeps on spinning. Here is an improvement which needs to happen, which is the case with all applications or tools. There is a lot of data, and either we have to change the way we are logging or the application needs to be enhanced."
"In the next release, I would like to see some new reports and more tiles on the Dashboard."
"The real complexity that I've seen with Dynatrace is to learn how to navigate through all the options in the troubleshooting process. We have a lot of ways to evaluate the same problem. We had some difficulties in the beginning with the use of the product, but after some time and some experience we have overcome this problem."
"The solution is pricy and has room for improvement."
Dynatrace is ranked 2nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 341 reviews while JenniferSoft is ranked 52nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 1 review. Dynatrace is rated 8.8, while JenniferSoft is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "AI identifies all the components of a response-time issue or failure, hugely benefiting our triage efforts". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JenniferSoft writes "Easy to deploy, stable, and scalable". Dynatrace is most compared with Datadog, New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security and Azure Monitor, whereas JenniferSoft is most compared with Grafana.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.