We performed a comparison between Falcon LogScale and Logpoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."It offers the capability to view live log ingestion directly from the console which means you can seamlessly manage live log data ingestion alongside accessing and analyzing older data from the past."
"The search feature is valuable. The dashboards are also valuable for our bosses. Another valuable feature, which is the main feature of the product, is the centralization of all the logs."
"The most valuable features are the ones that we use the most, which are the search and report facilities."
"The solution is user-friendly."
"Technical support is responsive and very friendly."
"The solution's user interface is quite simple, and the integration is better than other products."
"The product is easy to use."
"The most valuable feature of LogPoint is that they have the SIEM and SOAR combined in one solution. They are not on a separate platform."
"They basically charge you in a better way."
"There are some overlapping features found in multiple tools."
"I know that they have user behavior analytics, but it's an extra cost for this feature. It would be nice if it was in with the standard products."
"One of the downsides is it is not a SaaS solution. It must be on-premises."
"The general public wasn't looking for that type of product unless you had a company that was medical or financial and needed 24-hour responsiveness."
"The thing that makes it a little bit challenging is when you run into a situation where you have logs that are not easily parsable. If a log has a very specific structure, it is very easy to parse and create a parser for it, but if a log has a free form, meaning that it is of any length or it can change at any time, handling such a log is very challenging, not just in LogPoint but also in everything else. Everybody struggles with that scenario, and LogPoint is also in the same boat. One-third of logs are of free form or not of a specific length, and you can run into situations where it is almost impossible to parse the log, even if they try to help you. It is just the nature of the beast."
"Dashboards could be developed further."
"It is complicated to collect daily logs from other systems."
"Log management could be better because transporting the log from a password to the client system takes time."
"One of the things we faced last year was that we had some memory issues with the server running. We were running them as virtual services, and we were facing some performance issues. Back then, there were some things that had already been solved at the end, but one of the small issues we had was that it was quite memory-consuming. After one upgrade that we did, we faced some performance issues."
Falcon LogScale is ranked 34th in Log Management with 1 review while Logpoint is ranked 29th in Log Management with 20 reviews. Falcon LogScale is rated 9.0, while Logpoint is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Falcon LogScale writes "A highly commendable and robust solution offering powerful features and comprehensive log data management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Logpoint writes "Good technical support but it is complex to use and resource-heavy". Falcon LogScale is most compared with Elastic Stack, Splunk Enterprise Security, Grafana Loki and LogRhythm SIEM, whereas Logpoint is most compared with IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security, Rapid7 InsightIDR, Microsoft Sentinel and SolarWinds Security Event Manager .
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.