We performed a comparison between Falcon LogScale and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."It offers the capability to view live log ingestion directly from the console which means you can seamlessly manage live log data ingestion alongside accessing and analyzing older data from the past."
"Its usability is the best part. It is easy for our developers to use if they want to search their logs, etc."
"The consolidated overview of all the events that come in through our environment and an easy-to-access interface for all our end users are valuable."
"The initial setup isn't overly complex."
"It's better than IBM, in my opinion, because it's an independent entity."
"Capability to expand the functionality through custom code for data inputs, commands, visualization, alerts, and machine learning."
"It helped us consolidate all our solutions into an easy tool to use for various employees."
"The most valuable features in Splunk are the search function and the ability to run selected session reports. The session reports are important because I can use them to see what is going on in our environment weekly. Additionally, we can use the graph to see how often that particular event is happening."
"The dashboard and reporting are very good... It provides very good visibility in a hybrid cloud environment, and you can build custom utilization APIs using Splunk."
"There are some overlapping features found in multiple tools."
"The only improvement I am expecting is the cost of the licensing. Clients are going to other solutions just because of the cost."
"There are a lot of competitive products that are doing better than what Splunk is doing on the analytics side."
"Most of my interaction is with the user community, which is how Splunk wants it. When I need help, that community is very hit or miss."
"One issue is that we are getting a lot of false positives. We are trying to reduce them by customizing the default rules, changing thresholds, and using white-listing and black-listing. It's getting better and better as a result. But they need to build components that would reduce the false positives."
"Splunk does not build apps. They only go back and validate the apps that somebody has already built. They should have remote consulting support. They have a wonderful solution. They have 24/7 security. Nobody needs to depend on any third party and will therefore just buy Splunk on the cloud."
"Its search or filtering capability is nice, but it can be improved. It is currently a bit complicated, and it should be simplified. If we can write the search filter in a more simplified way, it would be better."
"The integration could be a bit better. They charge for certain integrations."
"Sometimes, there is latency in the logs."
Falcon LogScale is ranked 34th in Log Management with 1 review while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 1st in Log Management with 240 reviews. Falcon LogScale is rated 9.0, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Falcon LogScale writes "A highly commendable and robust solution offering powerful features and comprehensive log data management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". Falcon LogScale is most compared with Elastic Stack, Grafana Loki, LogRhythm SIEM, Exabeam Fusion SIEM and Sumo Logic Security, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, Dynatrace, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security and Microsoft Sentinel.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.