We performed a comparison between FlutterFlow and Microsoft Power Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Low-Code Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of FlutterFlow are the integrations and workflows."
"FlutterFlow offers a lot, but one feature that really helps me is the debugging features that allow me to test everything on the spot. This is really helpful."
"The most valuable features are low-code and fast development."
"The product has good usability, in terms of low-code applications."
"Time to market is most valuable because you can make apps pretty fast. It also has pretty good integration."
"Of all of the solutions I evaluated, it was the easiest to use and deploy."
"The cloud aspect has been great. We don't have to do a lot of research in order to begin integrations. It's so easy to integrate with other solutions."
"If you want something that you can use for cellphones, multiple tablets, and things like that, you can use PowerApps for the front end. It gathers all the information, and the information goes somewhere else."
"The UI functionality is the most valuable aspect of this solution."
"The solution is easy to use and map."
"The UI components could be more standardized. Sometimes, for certain properties, I have to search more than I do with other platforms. With other platforms, once you know one, you know all. But with FlutterFlow, sometimes you have to look around for what you need."
"There is room for improvement in advanced functionality so it could cater to more complex app development needs."
"Microsoft PowerApps is not intended for customizing what's generated in a major way."
"The fact that we couldn't share that with our other organization or outside of the organization, consisting of our colleagues in the joint ventures, was a weakness of the solution."
"It's sometimes hard to import groups of options. At this point, I need to enter those manually and it slows the process down."
"The documentation isn't great. It's only 75% of what you need to know. If you go beyond that and run into issues, it's really not going to help you."
"The portal and canvas apps need to be improved and brought up to speed."
"The flexibility and the user interface need improvement."
"One of the major problems with it is what PowerApps calls the delegation warning. Regardless of what platform, data source, et cetera, that you're using, you can't retrieve more than 2000 records."
"In an upcoming release, I would like to see custom APIs, better integration with other solutions, and more connectors available."
FlutterFlow is ranked 18th in Low-Code Development Platforms with 2 reviews while Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Low-Code Development Platforms with 78 reviews. FlutterFlow is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of FlutterFlow writes "Simplifies integrations, accelerates development timelines, and offers a good MVP". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". FlutterFlow is most compared with Mendix, whereas Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and Zoho Creator. See our FlutterFlow vs. Microsoft Power Apps report.
See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.