We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and OneLogin by One Identity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We are able to onboard new user accounts much faster by automating the process and standardizing our operations globally. Previously, there were many individual processes and manual admin interactions. We also see a lot of cost savings and benefits because through automation and standardization."
"Omada's onboarding features reflect our processes for onboarding new employees well. That is the primary reason we use this solution. We use role-based access control. I'm not sure how much it has improved our security posture, but it's made managing identities more convenient."
"The best feature in Omada Identity is that it enables us to implement standardized employee life cycle processes so that we don't have to create them ourselves. We can then use the standard workflows. The breadth and scope of the solution’s IGA features also fulfill our requirements."
"It has a lot of out-of-the-box features. It is flexible, and there are a lot of possibilities to configure and extend it. It is user-friendly. It has an interface that is end-user or business-user friendly."
"Its best feature is definitely the process design. It is quite easy and straightforward to design a process."
"We don't have to go in and do a lot of the work that we did before. It may have saved us somewhere in the range of 10 to 30 percent of the time we spent on provisioning access."
"Support-wise, working with Omada has been good. We have very good direct interactions and fast responses."
"Omada offers a technical solution that addresses both our needs."
"The most valuable feature is the flexibility in using the SMS messages."
"The solution's most valuable aspect is that it easy to install. The user experience is very good."
"The initial setup is so easy and there is no problem in the implementation."
"We use this product for SSL two-factor authentication and FortiToken management."
"The initial setup of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is easy."
"It keeps track of users and their IPs no matter where they are in the network. When users roam, we don't have to worry about not mapping them to an IP."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator are easy to configure, secure, and the application has good performance."
"Intuitive interface and easy to deploy."
"It's super useful to have a single pane of glass when it comes to access management."
"Simplicity is the most valuable part of OneLogin."
"The single sign-on and the fact that we can integrate everything in one place and control from there were valuable features of this solution."
"The most valuable feature is the ease with which we can manage the sign-on feature."
"OneLogin is efficient."
"One aspect I particularly appreciate is their exceptional customer support whenever I've needed assistance."
"The solution allows the user to search logs based on a specific time."
"When it comes to access management, the solution's single pane of glass is extremely important. The single pane of glass for access management enables collaborative work between IT and security. We have access to certain applications that require device trust. Based on the role, we can access those applications through OneLogin Desktop."
"The user interface could be improved. The interface between Omada and the user is mainly text-based."
"If I had to name one thing, it would be the user interface (UI)."
"Its flexibility is both a good thing and a bad thing. Because it is very flexible, it also becomes too complex. This is common for most of the products we evaluated. Its scalability should be better. It had a few scalability issues."
"The current reporting tools in Omada are limited, but we expect significant improvements in the new version."
"It is not possible to customize reports on Omada Identity."
"Omada could make it a bit more convenient to send emails based on events automatically. Having that functionality is critical for us to maintain transparency."
"The security permission inside Omada needs improvement. It's tricky to set up."
"The backend is pretty good but the self-service request access screen, the GUI, needs improvement. It's an old-fashioned screen. Also, Omada has reports, but I wouldn't dare show them to the business because they look like they're from 1995. I know they are working on these things and that’s good, because they’re really needed."
"The GUI has some shortcomings and can be made better. The GUI is not great."
"Improvements in the product could start from the dashboard, overall customization, and configuration."
"I would like to see integration and customization capabilities with the end-user portal to solve authentication issues with diverse implementation scenarios."
"Integration with some other enterprise applications could be improved."
"Fortinet FortiAuthenticator's initial setup process could be easier."
"They could expand FortiAuthenticator's capabilities to accommodate a broader range of environments."
"The solution could be more automated. It should be able to let me automate a lot of things so that what normally is done as a matter of manual processes can be handled quicker. Slow integrations can be taken up/out if there was more automation."
"The integration with other products, for example, some SAML authentications, would make it more flexible."
"They have downtime twice a year or once in six months. During the downtime, the SSO page did not come up. When users wanted to get to their email, they were redirected to the OneLogin page, but the page did not come up, and MFA and logins failed. It completely crippled us."
"The tool must be made more robust."
"The solution keeps going down for many hours, which impacts the entire company. You can't access any applications. OneLogin Desktop has a huge problem where it locks your computers and you need to reset the whole computer, which is pretty insane."
"OneLogin needs to increase the number of connectors available out of the box to connect to the different endpoints. The number of out-of-box connectors should be increased."
"To offboard, you have to manually click on this checklist, each of the checkmarks. It would actually be really nice if, for offboarding someone, you just click "offboard" and it automatically runs a script to do that."
"I'd like OneLogin to have a customization section that displays the company's offerings, categorized by different topics."
"While I initially used OneLogin's desktop feature to extend SSO, I discontinued it two years ago due to limitations."
"This product doesn't necessarily provide us with all of the functionality that we need, such as being able to share passwords with external users."
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is ranked 6th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 52 reviews while OneLogin by One Identity is ranked 9th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 16 reviews. Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is rated 8.0, while OneLogin by One Identity is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator writes "A reasonably priced solution that can be scaled toward different functionalities and offers flexible SMS messaging". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OneLogin by One Identity writes "Integrated well and had a single pane of glass, but downtime and pricing were issues for us". Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC, Fortinet FortiToken, Cisco Duo and Microsoft Entra ID, whereas OneLogin by One Identity is most compared with Auth0, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, LastPass and Imprivata OneSign. See our Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs. OneLogin by One Identity report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors and best Identity Management (IM) vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.