We performed a comparison between Google Cloud Storage and Wasabi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."From a stability standpoint, the solution is excellent. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable feature of Google Cloud Storage is the shared folder."
"It is flexible and simple to use."
"It's easy to use."
"Google Cloud Storage includes Docs, calendar, Gmail, Google Drive, and Google Meet."
"The most valuable features are the ease and accessibility of information."
"It’s very stable."
"The performance is good."
"The tool is very user-friendly."
"Wasabi is an easy-to-use solution."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is its cost."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"Basically, I set Wasabi up and forget it. I'll monitor it every once in a while just to make sure that it's working correctly."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is the backups."
"We can store our videos on hot storage, allowing immediate access to them."
"Google Cloud Storage could improve the integrations in a way Microsoft Azure is going about it. For Data Lake integrations, Microsoft Azure has a bunch of native pipelines available. All Google needs to do is add the same set or maybe even improve on the sets that they have. All the analytics, including the Data Lake, would then be able to sit in Google Cloud Storage."
"The solution could improve by adding an automatic removal of duplications feature."
"I would also like to be able to use my own tools and packages within this solution and also have a tool to visualize the data with graphics."
"Its security should be better from the data security point of view. It should be more secure, and it should get tightly integrated with products such as Google Docs and Google Sheets. Microsoft covers different kinds of tools such as Microsoft Office, Microsoft Word, and Microsoft Excel."
"Google Cloud Storage could improve by being more user-friendly."
"I'm not really comfortable with the user interface because I don't use it very often."
"The solution should improve its security and accountability."
"The product's user interface is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"I don't have enough experience to understand the nuances of where they might improve."
"Setting up users on the appliance should be improved."
"The solution must allow the extension of the retention period."
"The solution’s user reporting could be improved."
"Having the ability to upload and download data using third-party apps such as Mega which can sync to the desktop would be excellent."
"The scalability could improve."
"The scalability could be improved."
Google Cloud Storage is ranked 4th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 66 reviews while Wasabi is ranked 8th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 7 reviews. Google Cloud Storage is rated 8.8, while Wasabi is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Google Cloud Storage writes "Flexible, reliable, and beneficial for small sized companies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wasabi writes "An easy-to-use solution that can be used to move local backups to the cloud". Google Cloud Storage is most compared with Amazon S3 Glacier, AT&T Cloud Storage, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Microsoft Azure File Storage and Huawei FusionStorage, whereas Wasabi is most compared with Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon S3 Glacier, Amazon S3, Microsoft Azure Object Storage and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP. See our Google Cloud Storage vs. Wasabi report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
