We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure File Storage and Wasabi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a scalable solution."
"General user familiarity with Office 365 products make adopting this solution easy to adopt in production."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The initial setup is straightforward and takes approximately twenty minutes."
"Very user-friendly and intuitive."
"The storage in this solution is excellent."
"Implementations with other products are easy."
"The best part is the accessibility to all the files."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is its cost."
"Basically, I set Wasabi up and forget it. I'll monitor it every once in a while just to make sure that it's working correctly."
"We can store our videos on hot storage, allowing immediate access to them."
"Wasabi is an easy-to-use solution."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is the backups."
"The tool is very user-friendly."
"Microsoft Azure File Storage needs more integrations. In the future, I also want to see GRC added to the portal. If you enroll or sign up for Azure services, your country may not have GRC available in the portal, so you may have to choose a strange country, for example, Kenya, to activate credit."
"Considering the enterprise licensing required for the solution, the cost of the solution is an area where the product needs improvement."
"It would be good if they added some features that make the solution easier to access for everyone."
"Microsoft Azure File Storage is not that easy to use."
"It would be helpful if we could remove data that we don't frequently access to reduce the cost of the storage."
"Firewall rules should be introduced to secure the access date from any virus attacks. Anti-virus should be introduced in the work filtering and document filtering."
"The product must provide better security functions."
"The integration of the site storage with SQL was not completely seamless."
"The solution’s user reporting could be improved."
"The solution must allow the extension of the retention period."
"I don't have enough experience to understand the nuances of where they might improve."
"The scalability could improve."
"Setting up users on the appliance should be improved."
"Having the ability to upload and download data using third-party apps such as Mega which can sync to the desktop would be excellent."
"The scalability could be improved."
Microsoft Azure File Storage is ranked 3rd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 44 reviews while Wasabi is ranked 8th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 7 reviews. Microsoft Azure File Storage is rated 8.2, while Wasabi is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure File Storage writes "Various storage options available, high availability, and quick deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wasabi writes "An easy-to-use solution that can be used to move local backups to the cloud". Microsoft Azure File Storage is most compared with Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Azure NetApp Files, Amazon S3 Glacier, Amazon S3 and Google Cloud Storage, whereas Wasabi is most compared with Amazon S3 Glacier, Google Cloud Storage, Amazon S3, Microsoft Azure Object Storage and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP. See our Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Wasabi report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
