We performed a comparison between Grafana and Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It integrates well with other solutions."
"The most valuable aspect is customization. There are many customizations possible, so I like that."
"The most important feature of Grafana is its alarm formatting capability."
"The initial setup is straightforward with just a few clicks on the solution's cloud."
"The best feature was the creation of graphs and trends."
"We can write queries in different languages, which is beneficial for visualization."
"Provides good dashboard visualization."
"Collaboration: Shares data and dashboards across teams."
"It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services."
"Service Bus topic subscription monitoring turned out to be the most useful for us."
"The security needs to be improved, such as the capacity to add permissions on dashboards."
"One area for improvement in Grafana is that depending on your version, you have to pay for the features, making the license expensive. It would be great if the licensing model could be more flexible. In the next release of Grafana, I want cluster creation to be available, which would help in Grafana deployment and scaling. Currently, the scaling process for the solution is a bit complicated."
"They should improve the functioning of its editing tool."
"I find issues with Grafana. For example, I am unable to open some services there. Then, we have to open ten different tabs to get it fixed. And it's annoying when there's something going on; we want to check Grafana, and it throws four different errors."
"Its interface could be more accessible."
"There are not a lot of plugins for financial market monitoring."
"I would like the ability to download my results into any format in order to share the information with my clients."
"The solution should include online support."
"The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use."
"Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications."
Earn 20 points
Grafana is ranked 6th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 39 reviews while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is ranked 41st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Grafana is rated 8.0, while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Grafana writes "Agent-free with great dashboards and an active community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) writes "Great topic subscription monitoring, helpful management, and useful for audits". Grafana is most compared with New Relic, Sentry, Azure Monitor, Elastic Observability and Dynatrace, whereas Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is most compared with Azure Monitor. See our Grafana vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.