We performed a comparison between IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It helped with some of the regulatory requirements. It also helped with some of the security analytics and analysis. It was worthwhile from that perspective."
"The most valuable feature is that it provides a simple English recommendation on actions that you need to take once a vulnerability is discovered."
"The reporting features are good and there are many built-in reports that can be quickly configured."
"A new user can easily understand the workflow, even if they are creating users for other divisions and the user is a beginner."
"The vulnerability management itself is the most valuable feature as well as references to the mitigation techniques."
"The price of Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is reasonable as it is ten times cheaper than other options."
"It is very stable, and it is updated periodically by adding new vulnerabilities."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"The dashboard is pretty intuitive, and it lets you do a drill-down analysis of each vulnerability. That is something that brings a lot of value to the organization."
"The initial setup is mostly straightforward."
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"It was not as easy to use. The user-friendliness of it was somewhat lower than what I was expecting. It was also lacking in terms of the ease of the setup. There should be an automatic agent for deployment."
"Building policies is not that easy. There are some things that are turned off by default, for example, displaying values."
"The interface could be improved by having sub-groups of tests, ultimately making the process of collecting tests faster."
"The solution seems to focus too much on enterprises, and they really need a product that works for SMBs."
"The solution must be promoted more in the market."
"The product could be easier to set up on the cloud."
"It would be helpful if Tenable could be more clear with regard to everything the solution can and cannot do with the particular license that you have."
"The shortcoming of the solution that needs improvement is related to its capability to do vulnerability assessments on applications."
"An area of improvement for this solution is being able to customize the dashboard. For example, the dashboard does not allow us to view a previous months vulnerability results alongside current results to make comparisons."
"The reporting was never great in Tenable Vulnerability Management, so, in my company, we imported all the data into Ivanti RiskSense to start using it for reporting."
"They should include better customization of the dashboard, and integration tools."
More IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is ranked 40th in Vulnerability Management with 3 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 39 reviews. IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is rated 6.6, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment writes "Worthwhile from the regulatory requirements and analytics perspective, but is expensive and not easy to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Acunetix, Rapid7 InsightVM and Orca Security, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management. See our IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
