We performed a comparison between IBM Maximo and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Asset Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We are very thankful to have IBM integrated with our own Legacy cloud-based system"
"IBM Maximo is a very strong and powerful tool in the market…Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"It is configurable, where you can add extra fields to screens and to the database."
"We were able to scale perfectly."
"I have found Work Order management the most valuable feature. Additionally, it is a very robust and powerful solution."
"The most powerful features are the database and integration with CMDB."
"Has a powerful audit combination that helps achieve high accuracy."
"Work order management and scalability enables the businesses' needs to be met."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The most demonstrable feature is the asset creation form, which is quite informative."
"The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would."
"The product enables us to track our assets."
More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management Pros →
"I feel that the interface is a little too complicated with a large number of fields to enter."
"Areas for improvement include: an enhanced Service Catalog on Mobile; Agent intelligence; better dashboards for KPIs."
"It needs full-service visibility. There are a lot of things that are hard for users to find out. For example, the Service Catalog is not too friendly. You really have to know what you're looking for."
"The pricing model of the solution has room for improvement as well as the after-sales support."
"You can get lost using the application"
"This solution could improve by integrating or embedding finances, charts of accounts, and invoicing."
"Areas for improvement would be the user interface and support for Arabic. They could also be more customer-oriented."
"The mobile solution has a lot of room for improvement, especially in geopositioning capabilities, tracking capabilities, and configuration capabilities, in order to let the tech operate online and offline."
"The UI and UX need severe improvements."
"The solution’s depreciation calculation setup needs to be improved because it is slightly disintegrated."
"The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would."
"The product must improve the approval process of asset transfer and disposal."
More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management Cons →
More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Maximo is ranked 1st in Enterprise Asset Management with 23 reviews while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is ranked 5th in Enterprise Asset Management with 4 reviews. IBM Maximo is rated 8.0, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Maximo writes "Work order management and scalability enables the businesses' needs to be met". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management writes "The product is reasonably priced and easy to set up, but the UI and UX need severe improvements". IBM Maximo is most compared with ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, ABB Ability Asset Suite EAM, IFS Cloud Platform and Corrigo Enterprise, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is most compared with . See our IBM Maximo vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management report.
See our list of best Enterprise Asset Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.