We performed a comparison between Imprivata OneSign and Okta Workforce Identity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It provides a service that allows users to sign in to whatever application they are using. This is the most important feature of this solution."
"It has benefited my organization in the way that it makes it more secure by making it harder to hack."
"The solution so far has been very stable."
"The most valuable features depend on a customer's needs. Our customers generally find multi-factor authentication very useful."
"They have good push authentications."
"The most valuable features of Okta Workforce Identity are MFA, and SSO, which have high security."
"The most valuable features of Okta Workforce Identity are SSO, MFA, and beneficial feature sets."
"The MFA part is the best. MFA provided most of the security that we were looking at with respect to the second level of authentication. Okta Workforce Identity provides a number of options with respect to multifactor authentication, such as the app, phone call, and text. These options provide different ways of logging in for users, and they were a lot more than what we needed. This is certainly a very good feature of Okta Workforce Identity."
"Okta controls all the users. It has context-based access from the user and type of device. It identifies the risk and can do a step of authentication when that user is trying to access some sensitive application from an unknown device."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"I would like for them to make this solution compatible with Mac OS. I would also like for them to provide a portal so that users can easily integrate it with their applications."
"They should have a landing page."
"The solution’s policies are difficult to understand due to the policy methods. They use authentication. The solution’s workflow is also difficult and not very active. They need to have proper documentation on it. In the next release, I would like to see the workflows being more digestible."
"There should be automated aggregation and complete classification processes included in it."
"Okta doesn't have a partial push. It pushes down the full profile schema for lifecycle management or provisioning."
"We still had to write several internal programs/scripts to complete the user-provisioning process. Okta does not have the ability to provision mailbox accounts for on-premise Exchange or in a hybrid O365 environment. The Group Push function from Okta to AD did not work reliably in our environment."
"The initial setup can be complex at first."
"The solution is very expensive."
"This user integration with the Okta integration network could be simplified."
"It can have more API integrations."
Imprivata OneSign is ranked 12th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 2 reviews while Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 3rd in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 59 reviews. Imprivata OneSign is rated 9.0, while Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Imprivata OneSign writes "Reasonably priced, performs well, easy to deploy, and has responsive technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". Imprivata OneSign is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Evidian Enterprise SSO, Keeper, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Ping Identity Platform, whereas Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Google Cloud Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt and Auth0. See our Imprivata OneSign vs. Okta Workforce Identity report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.