Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"This solution allows you to easily access and make use of information that you have in your on-premises environment.""The feature I found most valuable in Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services is the mapping. You just drag, and it maps the data. Mapping is very easy, and it's no code. When you migrate data or when the data interaction happens at the source and destination, the challenge is that you'll get different formats. The validation has to be done in the middleware, and the transformation should happen. In Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, it's very easy to do data validation and transformation compared to any other tool.""I rate the solution's scalability a ten out of ten.""The data integration and synchronization features in IICS improve the data handling processes."

More Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services Pros →

"One special aspect of Azure Logic Apps is its easy integration of various applications, especially when connectors are already available. For instance, there are connectors for database applications and systems like SAP. You can drag and drop the connectors to complete your integration quickly.""The product’s most valuable feature is integration.""If there's something that isn't possible, you can write some code and call that code from a Logic App.""The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is the many available connectors that make automation easy. Additionally, the security of the solution is good.""The product's most valuable feature is scalability.""The solution has plenty of good valuable features and a plethora of services.""What I found most valuable in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is that you can run a workflow or do a high-level process orchestration, then you can call the other function and fulfill the process. For example, if you want to update a customer, you first need to get the customer's phone number and simulate the steps of the process, then Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can orchestrate that process.""The design is highly beneficial. It functions as a sandbox environment."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Pros →

Cons
"Synchronicity is an area for improvement in Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services. For example, when you want real-time or immediate response from the solution when multiple technologies are involved, the integration with Informatica Intelligent Cloud isn't seamless, whether it's the MQ, JMS, or BES service, so the connectivity should be improved a bit. The data governance is good, but what's lacking is a demo. For example, if there's a new feature in Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, the documentation for that new feature is limited, so if Informatica could give a more complete documentation and more demos, that would be better for the users. Right now, there isn't any issue with any of the features of the solution. It's the new feature awareness or user training, and improved connectivity that I'd like to see in the next version of Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services.""The product's pricing is definitely an area where a bit of improvement is needed.""This service could be more cost-effective.""There's definitely room for improvement in terms of user-friendliness. One example is that you can't search for jobs directly by file name. You can only search by job name. So, if you want to find a job that works with a specific file, you have to go through each job individually to find the right one. So, I'd like to see a faster search, one where I can search directly by file name."

More Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services Cons →

"The pricing could be improved.""The stability of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is stable. However, we have had some issues in the past. They do resolve issues that arise from new releases.""An area of improvement I've encountered is related to the number of connectors available in Logic Apps. While there are many connectors, I found that the "send email" connector may not work as expected, and one has to rely on Office 365 plugins or other alternatives. This could enhance user experience, especially when considering the additional overhead and licensing requirements associated with Office 365. It also needs to improve security features.""Especially when using a function or a parameter, that could be easier as that's not very well-documented, and it's not very clear from the tool itself how to use it.""Pricing and handling asynchronous processes are the two main areas that need improvement.""Not all connectors are readily available, though. There are two types: managed connectors and app connectors. Some connectors require you to provide a username and password to connect to platforms like SharePoint or Salesforce. Due to security constraints, some users may prefer not to use these connectors. Instead, they might opt for the HTTP connector.""It's for a limited kind of application or short Apps. And, not for the complex applications.""Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can improve by continually updating the connectors to make them better."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing model is something that can be improved."
  • "In terms of the licensing for Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, we had the option of paying based on the number of users and paying based on the volume of data, and we went with the data volume licensing option. Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services isn't as expensive as CIG. The pricing for it is okay, so I'm rating it a four out of five in terms of pricing. We did use the email verification and address validation services which weren't part of the contract, so we had to pay additional fees for those services."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • More Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The cost of the solution could be cheaper."
  • "If we are comparing to other public cloud vendors, such as Amazon or Google Cloud platform, I wouldn't say that it's expensive. However, when we're comparing between a host such as GoDaddy or Digital Ocean, then it's a bit on the expensive side."
  • "It's very cheap, but it comes with pluses and minuses. The positive thing is that it's very cheap, but on the other hand, it's extremely hard to tell how much it will cost. At the start of the project, it's almost impossible to tell how many times you will be calling some kind of Logic App function. You cannot state how much of the internet transfer you will use or how much data your will use."
  • "The price of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is inexpensive."
  • "Microsoft Azure Logic Apps could be costly if a user isn't careful. The costs associated with the solution could still be improved."
  • "The product is not cheap. I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."
  • "The pricing is not expensive."
  • "The pricing is okay. It's not highly priced. It's in the medium range."
  • More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The data integration and synchronization features in IICS improve the data handling processes.
    Top Answer:The solution is expensive. There is a need to make annual payments towards the license costs attached to the solution, but it is usage-based.
    Top Answer:There's definitely room for improvement in terms of user-friendliness. One example is that you can't search for jobs directly by file name. You can only search by job name. So, if you want to find a… more »
    Top Answer:The solution's most valuable feature is the no-code/low-code feature.
    Top Answer:In my experience, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is not a cheap solution. A few of my projects got delayed because of the charges. The pricing depends on whether an organization can handle all the costs… more »
    Top Answer:The solution should include more connectors. In one of my projects, we faced issues with SAP connectivity. The connector needed to connect the SAP was not compatible with our architecture. We had to… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    521
    Comparisons
    95
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    861
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    5,881
    Comparisons
    2,768
    Reviews
    26
    Average Words per Review
    481
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Informatica IICS, IICS
    Azure Logic Apps, MS Azure Logic Apps
    Learn More
    Overview

    Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services is a next generation iPaaS, which is made up of a growing number of data management products. The productivity of the environment is accelerated by a common user experience across all products, the AI/ML-driven intelligence of the CLAIRE™ engine, and a microservices architecture.

    Connect your business-critical apps and services with Azure Logic Apps, automating your workflows without writing a single line of code.

    Sample Customers
    2-1-1 San Diego, Hastings, AARP , Ace Hardware
    nord lock, mission linen supply, esmart systems
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization61%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Retailer4%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company33%
    Energy/Utilities Company11%
    Marketing Services Firm6%
    Healthcare Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization33%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Government5%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business6%
    Midsize Enterprise68%
    Large Enterprise26%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business46%
    Midsize Enterprise3%
    Large Enterprise51%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise39%
    Large Enterprise46%
    Buyer's Guide
    Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services is ranked 14th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 4 reviews while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is ranked 2nd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 31 reviews. Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services is rated 8.2, while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services writes "Good tool, especially if you're using cloud services and an S3 bucket". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps writes "Has different connectors for workflow and comes with low-code feature". Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services is most compared with , whereas Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Boomi iPaaS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and SAP Cloud Platform. See our Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps report.

    See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

    We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.