We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Oracle Integration Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has plenty of good valuable features and a plethora of services."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is the many available connectors that make automation easy. Additionally, the security of the solution is good."
"What I found most valuable in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is that you can run a workflow or do a high-level process orchestration, then you can call the other function and fulfill the process. For example, if you want to update a customer, you first need to get the customer's phone number and simulate the steps of the process, then Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can orchestrate that process."
"Logic Apps is valuable because my team uses it for integrating SaaS tool sets."
"I like the ability within Logic Apps to design the workbooks through the portal with minimal code."
"The tool’s biggest benefit is the access we have to other Azure products."
"Its integration capabilities are great, allowing connectivity with various applications and services."
"The product's most valuable feature is scalability."
"The initial setup is easy."
"I particularly like the drag-and-drop feature for designing integrations and processes."
"OIC offers a number of pre-built technology and SaaS adapters for high productivity for a wide range of target systems, both in-house via agents and cloud/SaaS, via a very flexible range of interfaces."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the SFTP adapters, file adapters, and risk adapters, that we use in everyday projects."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Integration Cloud Service is its performance."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Integration Cloud Service are the seeded integrations with many communication platforms, such as Slack and emails. It works best for the historical communication methods. Those are still prevalent with all the other clients. When we are doing the integrations, it makes it a little bit easier for us to communicate the same output over Slack, rather than sending out an email and downloading the report. The number of seeded functionalities within the Oracle Integration Cloud Service platform is better."
"OIC's accuracy is quite good."
"Technical support responds quickly."
"The pricing could be improved."
"The main issue is performance, especially when dealing with large amounts of data. Performance-wise, that's the only thing Microsoft should focus on."
"The documentation could be better. I think that's the only thing that was causing a normal level of problems. In terms of the documentation, it came from Cosmos DB and an additional product from Microsoft Azure."
"The standard logic app could be simplified. Thats what we would like to see in the next release."
"It can be a bit challenging to use."
"It would be beneficial to have less code and tighter integration between different cloud services."
"The solution lacks sufficient connectors."
"It would be helpful if the vendor could provide more data connectors."
"Dealing with the large file size has occasionally been a challenge."
"The error retrying mechanism could be improved. If an error occurs, it can be retried automatically, it would be helpful."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service can improve the downloading and uploading of files. I've submitted this issue to the Oracle Idea Labs. The issue is from the front end of Oracle Integration Cloud, we cannot download or upload a file directly or drag and drop it."
"In designer mode, sometimes the browser closure or other unknown issues can cause strange behavior, which requires a restart."
"There are a few features that we noticed are not in the cloud. There are some improvements needed. One example is the graphical user interface that needs to improve, it could be easier to use."
"We would love to have more and more ready-to-use interfaces from Oracle."
"If an inbound file is larger than one GB, it cannot be transformed within Oracle."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service can improve file handling. Currently, our real-time file polling limitation is 10 MB, if that size can be increased it would be helpful. For example, increasing the size from 10 MB to 1 GB."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is ranked 2nd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 31 reviews while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is rated 8.0, while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps writes "Has different connectors for workflow and comes with low-code feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Boomi iPaaS, SAP Cloud Platform, Workato and webMethods.io Integration, whereas Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), AWS Glue, Mule Anypoint Platform, Oracle GoldenGate and SAP Cloud Platform. See our Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. Oracle Integration Cloud Service report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.