We performed a comparison between Iron Mountain Connect and NAKIVO Backup & Replication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities"
"The upgrade process is manual but very simple to do."
"NAKIVO is easy to use and pretty easy to set up."
"We have found all the features of Nakivo to be useful and the solution is easier to use compared to Proxmox. It is user-friendly, we are very satisfied."
"It has saved us numerous times from power outages and server failure."
"Before using Nakivo Backup & Replication, all our data backup processes took a long time and did not optimize the disk space reserved for backup. With the introduction of Nakivo Backup & Replication, saving times have been reduced by almost half (thanks to the use of several simultaneous transporters) and the space occupied has also had a very important reduction."
"The price is much lower than competitors that do the same function."
"The solution is stable; there is no need to retry any sort of jobs in daily operations."
"Nakivo offers direct support through the graphical interface and this is great to have if you need quick help."
"I would like to see more integration with different platforms."
"Sometimes, for some VMs and some Windows Server versions, specifically old versions (aka server 12 or older) fail due to the VSS writer error or locking file system."
"We'd like to see a legacy environment backup, like AIX, etc."
"An improvement would be to give us more control over the email alerts, with different emails going to different addresses based on a set of rules."
"There are many features we have not had the opportunity to try, such as Tape Backups, Office 365 backups, and many other things."
"The backup speed needs improvement."
"Automatic updates do not work, and every update has to be done manually."
"Compression and data deduplication are okay, but they could be improved."
"The reporting features could be enhanced to provide more detailed and customizable reports for better insights into backup operations."
Iron Mountain Connect is ranked 39th in Backup and Recovery with 2 reviews while NAKIVO Backup & Replication is ranked 6th in Backup and Recovery with 85 reviews. Iron Mountain Connect is rated 8.6, while NAKIVO Backup & Replication is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Iron Mountain Connect writes "Good policies related to data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NAKIVO Backup & Replication writes "Good deduplication, easy to configure, and offers a free version". Iron Mountain Connect is most compared with IBM Spectrum Protect and Veeam Backup & Replication, whereas NAKIVO Backup & Replication is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup, Acronis Cyber Protect, Rubrik and Zerto. See our Iron Mountain Connect vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.