We performed a comparison between iServer and MEGA HOPEX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Architecture Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has wide use within Microsoft products. The integration with Microsoft products, and, in particular, Microsoft Office, is great."
"There were lots of different requirements, and collaboration and review is one of the biggest things. There is also Office 360 integration, and there's flexibility to use it as a database as well."
"The solution is easily modified to suit your needs."
"The initial setup is easy."
"Tech support is very responsive. They solved issues within a prompt response time."
"We like the governance."
"This is a flexible tool compared to some other solutions."
"It has helped having data lineage in the business cluster, which is used as control artifacts."
"This is a complete package with all of the functionality that we need."
"The dashboard on the homepage makes for an enhanced view at a glance of the various work functions applicable to the user."
"Customer support is fantastic. They are very helpful whenever we get on the line with the support team."
"We use the portfolio management feature heavily."
"Every module sets up the same information in a unique repository."
"It is very interactive."
"The solution is scalable. If a company needs to expand it, it's completely possible to do so."
"The initial setup was straightforward. With configuration, customizing or prepping the data and deployment, it took about one year to set up. We only needed two people to deploy and maintain the solution: one business architect and someone who specializes in customization and operations."
"There can be some performance issues using the solution that should be improved. When you make modifications modify to files there are embedded data within that can take a while to process."
"The modelling needs improvement, specifically forecasting capabilities and scenarios."
"It runs relatively slowly."
"It definitely needs help to improve the visual aspect of the solution."
"The performance is slow, which is something that should be improved."
"Cannot see which activities are control activities."
"There are other solutions out there that have a better user interface."
"There could be features for process mining, process simulation, and analytics."
"We would like to see integration with other products, such as being able to use our workflow with SharePoint and Microsoft Office."
"The initial setup can be quite complex at first."
"The product must improve integration with other tools."
"The solution lacks additional models compared to other tools."
"Better documentation and training would be helpful."
"Scalability can be a problem sometimes."
"Needs a friendlier import/export to other modeling tools."
"MEGA HOPEX can improve process simulation in the BPA module. If the solution was better we would not have to use another solution for this purpose. Simulating scenarios in the future for the to-be processes is in demand. If we can have the simulation engine built inside MEGA HOPEX, we would not have to purchase another license or solution to integrate them with each other. This would be a great improvement."
iServer is ranked 6th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 15 reviews while MEGA HOPEX is ranked 4th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 36 reviews. iServer is rated 7.2, while MEGA HOPEX is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of iServer writes "Enables flexible parameters for any process model and has a valuable document management feature ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MEGA HOPEX writes "Easy to use and robust with good features". iServer is most compared with LeanIX, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Visio, ARIS BPA and BiZZdesign HoriZZon, whereas MEGA HOPEX is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, LeanIX, ARIS BPA, Visio and Camunda. See our MEGA HOPEX vs. iServer report.
See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors and best Business Process Design vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.