We performed a comparison between Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager and Kaseya VSA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Patch Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Clear visibility regarding the status of the endpoint."
"The product is easy to use, easy to implement, and easy to manage."
"It's been doing a lot for us, especially with third-party software patching and scheduling. We create multiple projects for monthly patch distribution and manage it all well."
"When it comes to Ivanti Patch for endpoints, I find peer-to-peer patching valuable. Having a peer-to-peer patching capability is highly beneficial for us."
"Kesaya is highly configurable."
"When compared to what we were previously using, one of the most appealing features is that it combines remote control, patch management, and software management into a single portal."
"I like the remote control, audit, inventory, patch management, software management, and monitoring features."
"The most valuable features of this solution are automation, inventory, and patch management."
"The patch management and the remote support are very good, especially the remote support. There is a module built into the solution which allows remote control without necessarily interrupting the user. We could manage things in the background without them seeing or interacting with anything, which is a very useful feature."
"The remote support is the most valuable aspect of the solution."
"We can schedule the patching of the endpoints."
"Patch management was very useful. Backdoor access to the clients was also very useful."
"Inability to configure a rule-based management."
"The major challenges are macOS updates, patching, and backups. And for drawbacks, I wish Patch management was cloud-based instead of hosted on our own server."
"The UI must be more user-friendly."
"It would be great to have an easier way to patch Linux machines within the product."
"The main difference would be the addition of audio transfer between the end-user and the remote connectivity software. That is the one critical piece that we are currently lacking."
"Sometimes, the product misinterprets the functionality of a machine."
"Kaseya VSA could be improved with more features to support the latest operating systems."
"The technical support of the solution is an area with shortcomings that needs improvement."
"I would like to see improved virtual infrastructure management."
"Our main concern is related to security. Kaseya had a ransomware attack a few months ago, and it was a big concern for us because Kaseya was the main RMM tool that we were using. We faced a lot of difficulties accessing our users and systems. So, security is our main concern."
"We actually upgraded the solution due to the fact that we needed the support for Apple devices. We haven't had a chance to test that part of the product just yet, however, that was our biggest criticism of the product prior to this most recent update."
"The user interface is somewhat outdated."
More Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager is ranked 17th in Patch Management with 4 reviews while Kaseya VSA is ranked 4th in Patch Management with 29 reviews. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager is rated 7.6, while Kaseya VSA is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager writes "Smoothly handles software patching and scheduling, enabling monthly patch distribution across multiple projects". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaseya VSA writes "Single portal management, cost-saving, with thorough technical support". Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager is most compared with GFI LanGuard, Ivanti Security Controls and Microsoft Configuration Manager, whereas Kaseya VSA is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, ConnectWise Automate, NinjaOne, Microsoft Windows Server Update Services and Datto Remote Monitoring and Management. See our Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs. Kaseya VSA report.
See our list of best Patch Management vendors.
We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.