We performed a comparison between JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and SAP ERP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The financials are great."
"I think it is strong in sales, inventory, and pricing."
"The product can scale."
"The tool is valuable for its rich set of functionalities and stability. The solution is stable. The customer service and support is good."
"Traceability is the most valuable feature of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne...The stability of the solution is excellent."
"We find the ease of use, customization, and user interface valuable."
"The solution is stable."
"It is easy to inquire about any account in our company."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"I like that SAP ERP is very robust and stable."
"It is a utility-focused solution, and the deployment is very much aligned with utility service providers. If you look at the supply chain and the overall business model of a utility service provider, SAP is something that fits very well. That's because the company has invested tremendously in creating appropriate workflows pertaining to this segment or domain."
"It meets our requirements for what we need it to do in the manufacturing industry."
"SAP is more reliable in terms of data quality than other systems."
"The solution is quite scalable."
"Everyone who uses SAP ERP has benefited from the functionality."
"The payroll solution and the localization for advances are valuable."
"The solution could improve by having additional efficient analytics available to more users. They should allow a sample database to be able to test and do proof of concept would be extremely valuable to all of our clients."
"I haven't come across any downsides just yet."
"They need to improve the logs and need to write some sort of script that clears logs after so many days."
"We found that the system was unable to address many of our concerns, especially when it comes to project management."
"It does not submit the inquiry as requested. We have to close the application and restart the computer."
"They have the interface with Hubble and other reporting, however, we just want that to be a part of JD Edwards."
"From the operation perspective, it could offer more functionality for the APIs."
"The solution could be easier to implement. However, the complexity was in our internal processes meeting our country's requirements. Every country has a slightly different process, taxation, and rules. That was the difficult part, not the solution itself. I expect our experience would have been more or less the same with any ERP, such as SAP, Navision, or Dynamics."
"ERP could use better integration with other systems."
"The service could be more user-friendly in the area of transition codes."
"It's difficult to code; structured language is difficult."
"When evaluating the current version I am using now, the SAP GUI is old-style and needs to be replaced with something more modern and easy to use. However, the SAP GUI is very optimized for connection networks and is extremely good. Many people would like to have a WebGUI or something else to have access in a different way. Additionally, there could be some drag and drop functionality added because these features are normally in any website that this solution does not have."
"The user interface needs to be improved."
"One thing that is lacking in ERP is a good user interface. It is currently very clumsy and complex. Another thing is that reporting capability of SAP ERP is customizable, but it is not very good. Its development time is also very high if you require specialized technical services. If you want to do any changes to the report or develop a new report, you need people with specialized skills. Business processes are very straightforward and standardized as per the industry standards. However, the way it works is a bit complex, and you need to know a lot of things. There are different things that can be complex for a general user. A lot of information is being provided in ERP. A general user doesn't require all this information, and it creates a lot of confusion. Its learning curve is very high."
"Technical support could be better."
"Pricing could be improved for preferred customers."
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 7th in ERP with 55 reviews while SAP ERP is ranked 1st in ERP with 100 reviews. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2, while SAP ERP is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP ERP writes "The amazing, robust framework with unlimited scalability earns its #1 status". JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, PeopleSoft, SAP S/4HANA and Oracle E-Business Suite, whereas SAP ERP is most compared with SAP S/4HANA, Microsoft Dynamics AX, Anaplan, SAP Business One and PeopleSoft. See our JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. SAP ERP report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
