We performed a comparison between Jitterbit Vinyl and OutSystems based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Low-Code Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."You do not need to be a programmer to use it or build something in it."
"We have been able to leverage the platform to rapidly build custom solutions, and tailor-make them to our needs."
"The product is super fast at getting things done."
"The integration is a huge accelerator into enabling new business processes. As a small company, we have a few different systems that otherwise couldn't talk to each other. We recognize, from an IT perspective, the value that data and change in status of certain data in one area could influence the ability to take action in another. With these integration points, we are able to essentially create that communication from one system to another, letting system B know that something has been completed or is ready in system A. That allows our users to know that they are ready to complete a task. Without that, we would be relying on a lot of manual communication. We would be relying on individuals sending emails, saying, "Hey, by the way, this is ready in system A." Now, we have the system recognizing it and shooting that email off automatically, with all the instructions necessary."
"The fact that it's no-code is one of the most important features because it allows us to deliver very quickly. We can get the value to the business delivered much more quickly than with other solutions."
"The ZPM system enables us to organize projects and monitor their progress. The ease of logging into the VINYL app to test new features makes testing smoother, and we feel more involved in the creation of the app and its functions at every step of the way."
"We find it is easy to learn and use, and the user interface is easy to pick up. We have trained some of our own people to be able to do apps with VINYL. Therefore, we can turn things around quickly."
"It is very scalable from its licensing to design. We have not had any performance issues when scaling."
"You can go huge - so it is definitely a scalable solution."
"OutSystems' best feature is that you can build tests with the flow, so even the tests are made in the PDD framework in a low-code way."
"Scalability proved to be an exceptionally beneficial feature."
"In terms of user support and community engagement, I rate the tool a ten out of ten."
"We can do the validation before calling the API."
"The technical support is perfect."
"The most valuable feature of OutSystems with discipline and the development processes. Instead of each developer doing tasks on their own with their own approach, et cetera, the solution would help bring some organization to the development process."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it allows users to easily build applications."
"The calendar has room for improvement, but that's what they're going to be working on next, to make a Gantt chart."
"Version 2.3 has a good UI but we want a more customizable UI."
"When you are trying to delete certain columns or delete or drop tables, it will throw an error and it will force you to hunt down every location where those things are being referenced. You have to delete them from the very end and work your way backward... It would be easier, when you're deleting that table, if it would concatenate all the way down."
"I sometimes find formatting tricky to get the front end of an app the way I want it."
"Perhaps the UI could be improved."
"The interface has had a lot of changes to it. It is better than it was before. However, with the subqueries in particular, this has been the most difficult part of the interface."
"While some of the reporting functionality is adequate, reporting needs to continue to be worked on, given the fact that there are a lot of really good reporting tools out there."
"It might help if they put out different types that would provide different ways to view the data. I'd like to see more on that."
"I have difficulty in using several new features. Some of the product's features are tricky to use as well."
"When shared extensions are updated, all the applications are redeployed."
"We had some lagging issues under high data loads, and the solution needed to be customized to improve this."
"The tool needs to improve the efficiency of its widgets."
"The initial setup is a little difficult."
"OutSystems could improve by being more like GitHub. It would be more helpful for us for division management and version control for our application."
"It needs improvement in the AI capability."
"The resource availability needs to be increased."
Jitterbit Vinyl is ranked 16th in Low-Code Development Platforms with 31 reviews while OutSystems is ranked 3rd in Low-Code Development Platforms with 46 reviews. Jitterbit Vinyl is rated 8.8, while OutSystems is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Jitterbit Vinyl writes "Can connect to any data source so we don't need to replicate data into a data warehouse to do reporting analytics". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OutSystems writes "Useful natural speech to algorithm, reliable, and beneficial automatic task". Jitterbit Vinyl is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps and QuickBase, whereas OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, Mendix, ServiceNow and Oracle Application Express (APEX). See our Jitterbit Vinyl vs. OutSystems report.
See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors and best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.