We performed a comparison between Jitterbit Vinyl and Microsoft Power Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have been able to leverage the platform to rapidly build custom solutions, and tailor-make them to our needs."
"One of the most valuable features of the solution is how rapid we can implement it, going from a design to an operational concept in a very short period of time."
"You can unite data which lives in different sources without moving that data."
"The product is super fast at getting things done."
"With the Lite Integration, I didn't to have to disrupt my entire organization to do something. We haven't had to disrupt IT and the business organizations to keep them up and running."
"The ease of moving around the platform cannot be understated."
"It's like breaking apart coding and development into an ultra-configuration tool... It really is flexible."
"It is very scalable from its licensing to design. We have not had any performance issues when scaling."
"Microsoft PowerApps's most valuable features we found are that it's very similar to the other Microsoft products, you can do the basic automation quite quickly. The interface is similar to the other Microsoft products which makes it easy to navigate around because we are used to Microsoft products."
"For our purposes, it is quite scalable."
"The initial setup is not complicated."
"It's very easy to build an app using this solution."
"The support is the most valuable feature."
"The solution allows you to use data to create excellent UI and quickly deliver an app. It speeds up production time."
"I like the galleries, which are really powerful."
"It's a very workable solution because it's an automated way of making applications. You have a template, you have the application know-how,"
"Once or twice, when a new version of VINYL comes out, it has had a negative impact on a feature. However, we do everything in a test environment. Unless we miss something in test, we don't go live with it if it isn't perfect. Zudy hasn't had too many stumbles along the way, but there have been a couple times, and it's been minor."
"The features that I'd like to see in VINYL next would be the ability to have more control over, or have a rule-based control over column headings and column labels."
"Perhaps the UI could be improved."
"While some of the reporting functionality is adequate, reporting needs to continue to be worked on, given the fact that there are a lot of really good reporting tools out there."
"The interface has had a lot of changes to it. It is better than it was before. However, with the subqueries in particular, this has been the most difficult part of the interface."
"The calendar has room for improvement, but that's what they're going to be working on next, to make a Gantt chart."
"I'd like to see the next release of VINYL have more user interface solutions to it, so that it could be a more user-friendly product on the front end for the customers that are utilizing the tool. We didn't have a solution to help automate all of our reporting in the past which identified the need to make sure that we could tap into our data sources and automate all of our reporting, which is exactly why we needed the tool."
"When designing the user interface, there are many built-in features; however, Vinyl could use some more extensive design elements that are used in marketing, such as Canva or Web design tools. These would allow for more extensive design elements to be added more easily."
"The editor in the Web browser could be improved because it can be difficult to implement the commands in the buttons."
"Improvements to the capturing of geographic locations and integration with maps would raise my score of the product from seven point five to its maximum of ten."
"The solution needs a bit more refinement in general."
"Technical support could be faster, and more accurate."
"We use GoCanvas to make forms. It's easier to make forms in GoCanvas, but Power Apps is cheaper because it is bundled with our Office 365 license. if I want to create a form in Power Apps, I need some knowledge, but GoCanvas is intuitive."
"If the price was reduced and the quality of the user interfaces was improved it would be beneficial."
"Customer support needs improvement."
"Microsoft is not cheap. The pricing could be lowered for their customers."
Jitterbit Vinyl is ranked 20th in Rapid Application Development Software with 31 reviews while Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 78 reviews. Jitterbit Vinyl is rated 8.8, while Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Jitterbit Vinyl writes "Can connect to any data source so we don't need to replicate data into a data warehouse to do reporting analytics". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". Jitterbit Vinyl is most compared with OutSystems and QuickBase, whereas Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and Microsoft Azure App Service. See our Jitterbit Vinyl vs. Microsoft Power Apps report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.