We performed a comparison between LambdaTest and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Geolocation testing is as straightforward as ticking checkboxes of browsers, operating systems, and countries."
"LambdaTest offers geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"
"The UI is pretty clean and easy to navigate, and we were able to figure it out very quickly."
"Our test execution time was reduced to 16 mins from five hours when executed in parallel on multiple VMs. This has been extremely helpful!"
"The most valuable features are that it's essentially on-demand, and you only focus on getting the code that needs to be executed without having to worry about the OS, hardware, etc."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The solution is very easy to understand and has a user-friendly UI."
"LambdaTest is easy to use, and the documentation provides all the needed information."
"The stability has always been very good."
"The debugging feature is valuable."
"The tool has highly detailed debugging features."
"The most valuable feature of Visual Studio Test Professional is its ease of use."
"The most valuable feature is the in-built support for C# and .NET projects."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability."
"User-friendly ID and direct integration with GitHub are the most valuable."
"The setup is easy and straightforward."
"Their smart testing module needs improvement."
"We get logged out of the devices if there is some inactivity."
"LambdaTest needs to have native application testing, which would be a great help to my team."
"I've also had some issues with the speed of certain API calls and the rendering of data. For example, when I'm onboarding data, the process can be slow."
"It would be much easier for us to read the test if they provided dashboard analytics."
"If possible to simulate the finger pinch, it would make it more realistic."
"The analytics over the automation dashboard can be more intuitive."
"Performing automation testing from UI is a little slow and could be improved."
"Visual Studio Test Professional needs to improve its scalability."
"The service right now is far too expensive. You need to pay per user."
"Its UI could be better."
"It would be great to support other languages and applications, and that is one of the things we can improve."
"The solution should be cheaper."
"The documentation is limited."
"Visual Studio Test Professional needs to improve its stability."
"The performance could be faster."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
LambdaTest is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 22 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 6th in Functional Testing Tools with 48 reviews. LambdaTest is rated 8.8, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of LambdaTest writes "Technical support should be improved, though it has great documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". LambdaTest is most compared with BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio and Perfecto, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and Tricentis Tosca. See our LambdaTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.