We performed a comparison between LogPoint and USM Anywhere based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: LogPoint is noted for its advanced technology and extensive log-collection, parsing, and analysis mechanisms. USM Anywhere is highly regarded for its extensive reporting capabilities, thorough vulnerability assessment, seamless file integration, and user-friendly management features. LogPoint can improve its dashboard customization, resource efficiency, network hierarchy diagrams, and agent deployment. USM Anywhere users have suggested improvements in self-service plugin management, database optimization, and third-party threat intelligence integration.
Service and Support: LogPoint's customer service receives high marks for its exceptional technical support and responsive engineers, but some users reported delays in receiving help from higher-level support. Some users say that USM Anywhere's customer service is knowledgeable and responsive, while others have faced delays and incomplete answers.
Ease of Deployment: The complexity of LogPoint's initial setup can range from complex and time-consuming to fast and easy, depending on the user's experience and the organization’s size. The initial setup for USM Anywhere is generally considered to be straightforward if the user has technical knowledge. Vendor assistance is also available during the deployment phase.
Pricing: LogPoint's fixed pricing model is seen as cost-effective and competitive. USM Anywhere is seen as more cost-effective than premium solutions like IBM QRadar and Splunk, with pricing considered reasonable and relatively low.
ROI: LogPoint makes costs more predictable and enables companies to generate revenue through security operation services. USM Anywhere has garnered favorable feedback regarding its ROI.
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"It is very easy to set up. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with ten being very easy to set up."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"The product is easy to use."
"The solution's most valuable aspect is the combination of the software and the support that they have."
"The most valuable features are the ones that we use the most, which are the search and report facilities."
"We like the user and entity behaviour analytics (UEBA) and find it valuable."
"The search feature is valuable. The dashboards are also valuable for our bosses. Another valuable feature, which is the main feature of the product, is the centralization of all the logs."
"The most valuable feature of LogPoint is that they have the SIEM and SOAR combined in one solution. They are not on a separate platform."
"The most beneficial was being able to prove, with proper reports, that from a compliance perspective, the company is in control. The service part of LogPoint did modifications or did some additional work to have the proper reports defined."
"The integration is very user-friendly. There are not many CLI commands. Everything is directly accessible from the web interface."
"It provides a single pane of glass view, coupled with a whole security ecosystem. The ability to manage everything from a central point, including vulnerability assessments, asset management - including the services provided by the various hosts, NIDS, HIDS, etc. - provides a very efficient way of dealing with things."
"Having everything in a central place has been helpful."
"As we have to service several servers, we can manage them in a economical way, which is beneficial to our team and business."
"The vulnerability manager and the file integration are very good."
"The setup is very easy and straightforward."
"Allowed us to help our customers satisfy compliance needs around logging and monitoring."
"We are able to get alerts perfectly with FIM and VA features."
"The solution is stable."
"The support needs improvement."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"Once, we had an event that was locked and blocked, but information about it came to us two or three days later."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"In terms of functionality, it is very good. The only issue is the documentation. Its documentation should be improved."
"It is complicated to collect daily logs from other systems."
"What could be improved in LogPoint is its UI because it's less friendly to users than LogRhythm. The UI could be more aesthetically appealing to users. It's completely outdated."
"We were missing visuals and graphics. Recently, a new version seems to have come out, and it has a new graphical user interface. When I was integrating it, it was usable, but the GUI needed improvement."
"Sometimes, the product is not stable."
"The solution should offer more integrations and third-party solutions like incident response platforms or allow access to third-party big data"
"LogPoint must find a way to integrate the servers without agents."
"Log management could be better because transporting the log from a password to the client system takes time."
"The reporting aspect could be improved. While there are a lot of different options available, there are still pieces which are missing."
"The GUI needs to improve because it's not user-friendly."
"This solution could be easier to use."
"In the future, I would like to see all these features of the solution working properly."
"I feel that some areas of improvement would be vulnerability scanning. We use a separate product that seems to do a much better job."
"The price of AT&T AlienVault USM could be reduced."
"The only room for improvement I can mention is the initial installation procedures. I found that the online installation instructions for the product were missing important details, they lacked necessary steps."
"they seem to have bugs from time to time that go unfixed for a while and that is frustrating. I'm not saying the product needs to be bug-free, but they need to be responsive to bugs."
Logpoint is ranked 26th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 20 reviews while USM Anywhere is ranked 11th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 113 reviews. Logpoint is rated 7.4, while USM Anywhere is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Logpoint writes "Good technical support but it is complex to use and resource-heavy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of USM Anywhere writes "Easy to use and affordable". Logpoint is most compared with IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security, Rapid7 InsightIDR, Microsoft Sentinel and Falcon LogScale, whereas USM Anywhere is most compared with Wazuh, AlienVault OSSIM, IBM Security QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security and Microsoft Sentinel. See our Logpoint vs. USM Anywhere report.
See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors, best Log Management vendors, and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.