We performed a comparison between ManageEngine Endpoint Central and Symantec Client Management Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Client Desktop Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a complete product that allows you to remote troubleshoot, has an inventory of systems."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"In terms of technical capability, it is doing very well. It is doing better than other industry products. It is at a place where we can compare it with Microsoft products. Its scalability is also good."
"Page management and ADA integrations are the most valuable features of ManageEngine Endpoint Central."
"The stability is very good."
"I like being able to image over the network. That's a nice feature that it has. Patch management is pretty decent on it as well."
"We can scale the product."
"Honestly, I have to say all features together have become the Swiss army knife of desktop management. They all work hand in hand. Software deployment saves an unbelievable amount of time installing an application on hundreds of computers."
"The most valuable feature of Symantec Client Management Suite is the ease of client management and agent installation."
"We can track the incidents, we can track the changes, we can track the assets from cradle to grave and give some kind of accounting as they get older."
"The most important thing for us is that it is very easy to use, as well as the availability of it in our support centers."
"The product's remote access manager needs improvement."
"The solution is expensive."
"Improvement should be done as per customer requirements."
"The MDM feature isn't very good. It doesn't support Amazon vendors."
"Not many things are needed for improvement, everything seems to be great as it is. One thing that would be good to have would be the ability to add MDM to a tablet running Android 5.0 using the EMM Token Enrollment. If we wanted to add MDM to an older tablet, we just have to go the "long route" to get it added."
"Desktop Central has very good information, however, you can't customize the dashboards."
"It is compatible with the systems such as Windows and Mac but not with Linux systems."
"ManageEngine Endpoint Central’s scalability could be improved."
"The technical support is in need of improvement."
"Some parts are working okay, some of the other components aren't. Workflow isn't working properly. Different people accepting changes and being able to close it has some issues. Putting hot fixes and installing it usually breaks the system."
"Symantec Client Management Suite can improve by adding more network devices."
More ManageEngine Endpoint Central Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Symantec Client Management Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →
ManageEngine Endpoint Central is ranked 1st in Client Desktop Management with 60 reviews while Symantec Client Management Suite is ranked 2nd in Client Desktop Management with 3 reviews. ManageEngine Endpoint Central is rated 8.2, while Symantec Client Management Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ManageEngine Endpoint Central writes "An in-depth and intuitive product with good cross-platform capabilities, but they should have a more global support channel". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Client Management Suite writes "Knowledgeable support, easy client management, and straightforward agent installation". ManageEngine Endpoint Central is most compared with Microsoft Intune, Microsoft Configuration Manager, VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro and Sophos Mobile, whereas Symantec Client Management Suite is most compared with Microsoft Intune and Microsoft Configuration Manager. See our ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs. Symantec Client Management Suite report.
See our list of best Client Desktop Management vendors.
We monitor all Client Desktop Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.