We performed a comparison between Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, Forcepoint and others in Internet Security."Menlo Security RBI's best feature is its threat isolation engine."
"With SASE, we have a single platform that covers multiple task services with which we need to control access. All the features are equally valuable."
"Zscaler Private Access is a platform that eliminates the complexity of VPN configuration."
"I like the web filtering capabilities."
"I find all Zscaler Private Access features valuable because each replaces flawed technologies, such as EPAs being replacements for VPN and PR as a replacement for PAM, so I can't mention only one valuable feature. Overall, Zscaler Private Access is a good solution."
"The product's most valuable features are cloud-based services and secure internet access. We don't have to set up any physical appliances."
"The VPN is great for the stability on offer and for the cloud updates and insights you can get."
"The solution offers a simplified network infrastructure and security functions and it enables secure remote access for the users"
"I like its ease of use. It has a single pane of glass for the ZIA and ZPA pieces. It is very manageable. It is also very easy to deploy for secure access, and it gives half-decent coverage for visibility in terms of what the users use and what data is being proxied through the access gateway."
"Menlo Security RBI could be more cloud-friendly, and its mobility could be improved."
"Setup is a bit complex because there are many steps that need to be taken before onboarding and activating the solution."
"The interface needs a bit of work."
"It would be better if the Zscaler Private Access team made it easier for people to find subscriptions on the portal, mainly information on what my customers subscribed to or the type of licenses purchased."
"While Zscaler supports client-initiated connections, it does not support server-initiated connections. This is a feature that Zscaler may consider adding in the future."
"What could be improved in Zscaler Private Access is its notification. For example, if there's a speed issue, there should be a pop-up that alerts the user about it. If there is a network quality issue, for example, it isn't good enough to connect to, or the network quality is bad, there should be a notification from the solution. Zscaler Private Access also needs improvement in terms of its interface and security."
"An area for improvement would be the ease of configuration."
"There is some issue while accessing the portal. It takes too long."
"To enhance their offering, it is advisable for them to focus on strengthening the foundation of their architecture. Additionally, they should consider integrating a broader range of services that go beyond what managed service providers typically offer independently."
More Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation Pricing and Cost Advice →
Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation is ranked 7th in Internet Security with 1 review while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is ranked 1st in ZTNA as a Service with 34 reviews. Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation is rated 8.0, while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation writes "Stable and scalable solution with a great threat isolation engine". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange writes "Allows for strict access control, granting access to specific applications at a URL level rather than at the physical IP level". Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Cloudflare Access, Cisco Umbrella, Skyhigh Security and Netskope Remote Browser Isolation, whereas Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is most compared with Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Cato SASE Cloud Platform, Axis Security, Cloudflare Access and Perimeter 81.
We monitor all Internet Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.